You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 42 Next »

Nonlinear Chemical Dose Controller

Abstract

Unknown macro: {float}

Unable to render embedded object: File (Non-linear CDC Design Draft F.jpg) not found.

Figure 1: Nonlinear CD Design

The nonlinear chemical doser (CD) is designed for turbulent chemical does flow rates. The linear CD requires that the chemical flow in the dosing tube be laminar. The linear CD uses the relationship between laminar flow and major losses in the doser tube to maintain a constant chemical dose with varying plant flow rates. However, when the flow in the dosing tube is turbulent, the linear relationship no longer exists. In this case, a nonlinear CD, one that uses minor losses to control flow rates, can be used to maintain a constant chemical dose with the varying plant flow rates.

Add a description of how the plant flow measurement device must be matched to the CD. Include the equations that show that the relationship between flow and height must have the same power relationship.
The figure shows an orifice that would be difficult to fabricate. Come up with a simpler design that can be fabricated at the construction site.
Could you provide clearer drawings of your design?

The advantage to designing a nonlinear CD is that higher chemical flow rates can be used. In larger water treatment plants

How large? What is the maximum plant flow rate for the linear flow controller? Note that the current AguaClara plants are using 120 g/L alum stock, but that commercial alum concentration is 640 g/L. The maximum alum concentration that we are willing to consider is controlled by the sharp increase in [Alum Viscosity] above 550 g/L. Thus we recommend not creating stock solutions over 500 g/L.

larger chemical flow rates are necessary to dose alum and chlorine. The limit of the linear flow control module is 400 ml/min. This maximum flow has been adequate for La 34, Ojojona, Tamara, and Four communities given their flow rates. It was necessary to use two flow controllers at Marcala to obtain a high enough alum dose. As the demand for larger AguaClara plants grows, larger chemical dose flow rates will be required. Furthermore, at high chemical flow rates, the head loss through the flow control module orifice requires that the chemical stock tank be elevated to an unreasonable height.

The link to the flow controller doesn't discuss the orifice issue. Define the head loss problem clearly. Which orifice causes the problem and why can't that problem be solved? Are you sure this is a constraint?

Methods

The nonlinear doser uses a dose control orifice (minor losses) instead of a dosing tube (major losses) to control the relationship between changing plant flow rates and chemical dose. The entrance to the rapid mix tank is also an orifice. Therefore, the relationship the total plant flow rate and the height of water in the entrance tank and the relationship between the chemical flow rate are controlled by orifice flow. The CD uses a lever arm to increase head in the flow control module when the plant flow rate increase. The increase in head links the chemical flow rate to the plant flow rate. The chemical dose is changed manually in the same fashion as for the linear CD.

A lever arm similar to the linear CD lever arm will be used to relate plant flow rate to chemical flow rate. A larger dosing tube is required to minimize major losses. This tube must be flexible to accommodate lever arm motion. Flow will be channeled through the dose control orifice into a channel. This channel will deposit chemical flow into the same position in the rapid mixer regardless of the corresponding dosing location on the lever arm.

Unknown macro: {float}

Figure 2: Flow Controller for Nonlinear module

To reduce head loss through the flow control module orifice, a new flow controller is being used in the design. The module being used is a PT 75 LS Kerick Valve. When choosing what size float valve to use, the constraints are the allowable flow rate through the valve, the head loss through the valve, and the size of the valve. In this case, a valve was needed that would allow a flow rate of least 15 gal/min, the maximum alum flow rate needed going into rapid mix. To minimize head loss, a 3/4 inch orifice was chosen. The flow controller will be mounted in a tub, so it cannot be too large. The float valve that fit all of these constraints was the PT 75 LS.

  • Document the design of the constant head tank float valve.
  • Distinguish clearly between the three orifices that are used (plant flow leaving the entrance tank, chemical flow leaving the dosing tube, and chemical panel valve).
  • Add a detailed description of the design algorithms that you created for the plant flow measurement orifice, the chemical flow orifice, the float valve, and the dosing tube.
  • Give the expected range of applicability of this design.
  • Describe the design process for the CD lever and float.

I would suggest editing the [Gracias entrance tank design] page first. The comments there urge you to write a more generic overview of entrance tank design, and you can document the rapid mix design there and then put a link on this page to that one. I don't think it would make sense to document the rapid mix design here, but you need to make sure there is a mention of it and a link to the design work. -Nicole

  • No labels