You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 32 Next »

Unknown macro: {alias}

Author: Rajesh Bhaskaran, Cornell University

Problem Specification
[1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT]
[2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT]
[3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT]
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
[Problem 1]

Problem Specification

Let's revisit the pipe flow example considered in the previous exercise. As before, the inlet velocity is 1 m/s, the fluid exhausts into the ambient atmosphere and density is 1 kg/m3. For µ = 2 x 10 -5 kg/(ms), the Reynolds no. based on the pipe diameter and average velocity at the inlet is

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large
$$

Unknown macro: {Re}

=

Unknown macro: {rhoVD over mu}

= 10,000
$$

At this Reynolds number, the flow is usually completely turbulent.

A turbulent flow exhibits small-scale fluctuations in time. It is usually not possible to resolve these fluctuations in a CFD calculation. So the flow variables such as velocity, pressure, etc. are time-averaged. Unfortunately, the time-averaged governing equations are not closed i.e. they contain fluctuating quantities which need to be modeled using a turbulence model. No turbulence model is currently available that is valid for all types of flows and so it is necessary to choose and fine-tune a model for particular classes of flows. In this exercise, you'll be turned loose on variants of the k-ε model. But in the real world, tread with great caution: you should evaluate the validity of your calculations using a turbulence model very carefully (which, ahem, means that there is no getting away from studying fluid dynamics concepts and numerical methods very carefully). FLUENT should not be used as a black box. The k-ε models consist of two differential equations: one each for the turbulent kinetic energy k and turbulent dissipation ε. These two equations have to be solved along with the time-averaged continuity, momentum and energy equations. So turbulent flow calculations are much more difficult and time-consuming than laminar flow calculations. This is an exercise to whet your appetite for turbulent flow calculations.

Go to [Step 1: Create Geometry in GAMBIT]

See and rate the complete Learning Module

Go to all FLUENT Learning Modules

  • No labels