You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 223 Next »

Foam Filtration

Numerous techniques of water filtration are in use today, most of which involve the use of sand as the porous media. A preliminary  literature review revealed a dearth of information on foam filtration. Our team has decided to focus on investigating the actual filtering capacity of a polyurethane foam material as opposed to the traditional method of sand filtration. With proper implementation, a foam filter could reduce the amount of water that is wasted during the backwash cycle of a traditional sand filter. A foam filter requires less surface area, and could potentially be less expensive to build than a traditional sand filter. However, a foam filtration unit will also require a tight seal with all of the edges of the tank, in order to avoid preferential flow paths which will result in unfiltered water. In addition, a foam filter will likely require manual maintenance by the plant operator.

Foam filtration has been ruled out for an AguaClara plant because the foam would be too difficult for an operator to clean. However, previous research has proven that foam is an effective method of filtration, therefore this team decided to focus on designing a point of use foam filtration unit. Due to chemical dosing and usability concerns, the point-of-use application was ruled out as a possibility for foam filtration. The team then focused on the design of an emergency filtration system that can be transported on the back of a pickup truck. After speaking with communities in Honduras, it was decided that foam filtration would be more useful in small communities. Research has been done to optimize the design such that it is as efficient as possible and provides the desired standard of 1 NTU effluent water turbidity. 

Read more.

Note: Turbidity is defined as the cloudiness of a fluid caused by suspended particles. Higher turbidities correlate to more opaque fluids.

Current & Future Research
After visiting Honduras, the apparatus designed in fall 2013 was implemented with mild success. The design met the desired constraint of 1 NTU however the filter was difficult to use, especially in cleaning. The Fall 2013 team designed the foam filtration unit to fit all into one 55 gallon drum. The apparatus consisted of two 23” disks: a roughing filter that used 30 ppi* foam and a finishing filter with 90 ppi foam. The filter unit was designed on the premise of providing water for a community of 100 families at approximately 1 L/s. The Spring 2014 team updated the apparatus for easy use and transport. In order to clean this unit, a user-friendly simple pulley design with a hoist supporting approximately 500 pounds of concrete was implemented to compress the foam with a hard plastic plunging disk. A side drain was spin-welded to the drum to drain the dirty water that pooled on the surface. This was the beginning model for summer 2014.


During summer 2014, our biggest goal is to send an updated model to Honduras. Before deploying the filtration system, several modifications will be made with input from engineers working in Honduras. These changes include installing the chemical dose controller and the flow controller to the structure. A new siphon tube fixed to the wall of the drum was substituted for the side drain to increase cleaning efficiency. Additionally, we are verifying any potential risk of using polyurethane foam in our filter by contacting foam manufacturers and reviewing literature. Testing will be done to investigate the effectiveness of a wholly constructed apparatus including flow control with coagulant and post-filtration chlorination. We are also investigating alternative designs including an automated hydraulic compression clean out system. A user guide will possibly be made after sending the apparatus to Honduras to aid future operators in construction and operation of the foam filtration system.

*PPI stands for pores per inch, which is a linear measurement of foam pore size. A larger pore size number (i.e.60 ppi) corresponds to a smaller pore size.

Documents

 

Challenges

Tasks

Symposium

Final Presentation

Final Report

Additional Materials

Summer '14

 

 

 

 

Spring '14

 

 

Fall '13

 

 

Spring '13

 

Fall '12

 

Summer '12

 

Spring '12

 

Fall '11

 

Spring '11

 

  • No labels