Plate Settler Spacing
Figure 1 shows the floc size that could be captured by different tube settler diameters. When the ratio has a value of 1, the sedimentation velocity matches the upflow velocity of the floc particle, and this is defined as the critical diameter, i.e. the floc diameter in which floc roll up will begin, for each of the given tube diameters and plate settler spacing.
Figure 1: The ratio of Sedimentation Velocity to Fluid Velocity vs. Floc Diameter
The graph is cut off at a particle size of 1 mm that is on the order of magnitude of size of a colloidal particle. For plate spacings greater than or equal to 2 cm and for tube diameters greater than or equal to 5 cm, it is predicted that there will be no floc roll up under AguaClara conditions.
Calculation of the Minimum Diameter of the Flocs that Settle from the Sedimentation Velocity Equation
Assuming an upward flow velocity of 1.2 mm/s, which used in the newer AguaClara plants, the diameter of floc that will roll-up was determined by using a root finding algorithm, and the plate settler spacing or tube diameter was plotted versus the minimum floc diameter. The minimum floc diameter corresponds to the minimum size of a floc particle that will roll up into the effluent; or the maximum size of a floc particle that the plate settler will prevent from going into the effluent.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Plate spacing vs floc diameter.png\) not found.
Figure 2: Plate Spacing or Tube Diameter vs. Minimum Floc Diameter
The minimum floc diameter corresponds to the minimum size of particles that will still settle out of the tube and return to the floc blanket instead of going into the effluent. With larger plate settler spacing, most floc roll-up could theroetically be eliminated.
The minimum floc diameter that will be captured for a given upflow velocity and tube settler diameter can be calculated in the equation below. This equation uses a simplification that the velocity profile is linear, not parabolic, near the wall. This linearized approach produces very similiar results (Perhaps statistically quantify this with some sample diameters.
Figure 3 graphically displays the linear velocity gradient solutions. The curves are not quite straight on a log log plot. This is due to the quadratic in the velocity profile. We can obtain a very good approximation by using the velocity gradient at the wall and assuming a linear velocity gradient. That assumption makes an analytical solution possible.
Figure 3: Floc Diameter vs. Spacing
For small floc sizes this linearization is valid and produces an analytical solution. For larger flocs that could roll-up, the linearization is invalid because the slope tends more and more parabolic closer the the center. However, Figure 4 illustrates that linearized equations show that with smaller tubes, the size of a floc particle that will roll up into the effluent varies very little with vertical velocity.
Figure 4: Floc Spacing vs. Floc Diameter
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
d = d_0 \left( {{{18V_t \Phi \nu _
Unknown macro: {H_2 O} } \over {gd_0^2 }}{{\rho _
} \over {\rho _
Unknown macro: {Floc_0 }
- \rho _
Unknown macro: {H_2 O}
}}} \right)^{{1 \over {D_
Unknown macro: {Fractal}
- 1}}}
$$
The critical velocity model can be utilized to calculate the desired spacing to capture a floc particle of a particular size. The following equation results were summarized in Figure 5. Figure 5 represents the minimum spacing that will capture a floc particle with a particular settling velocity.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
S = V_
Unknown macro: {up}
{{108\Phi \nu _
Unknown macro: {H_2 O}
d^2 } \over {g\sin ^2 (\alpha )d_0^3 }}\left( {{
Unknown macro: {d_0 }
\over d}} \right)^{D_
Unknown macro: {Fractal}
} {{\rho _
} \over {\rho _
Unknown macro: {Floc_0 }
- \rho _
Unknown macro: {H_2 O}
}}
$$
Where:
Unknown macro: {latex} \large$$ alpha $$
= The angle of the tube settler (60 degrees)
Figure 5: Minimum spacing vs. Floc Sedimentation Velocity
Figure 6 represents the absolute minimum plate settler spacing that will capture floc particles with a settling velocity of 0.12 mm/s in an AguaClara plant. Theoretically, any spacing below the intersection of two lines would produce a worsened effluent turbidity.
Figure 6: Minimum Plate Settler Spacing vs. Capture Velocity