Adam, Robert, Colleen, Jim, Boaz
1.Review Charge:Jim- bullets 1&2 are related to functional groups. Functional groups are not static.
After review - we do not feel like we are straying from the charge.
2. Ordering group. Jim reviewed the change he made to the charge on Basecamp.
ADAM - would like to see distinction between 1-5, 6-7, and 8. Phases need to be broken out and formalized. Jim thinks that leads from both institution to help with the charge. Robert - suggested a report could be due at end of each phase. Adam likes the idea of a pause for reflection. Phase 2, group will work TSI, may continue with a larger group or continue to collaborate.
we are creating a structure without a definite outcome.
Action item: Jim will rewrite the charge to indicate a break between phase 1 & 2, he will notify use through via email.
What others functional groups will exist? Jim made a working list? Focusing on a inventory of processes.
Action item: Add Copy cataloging/original cataloging. Change Metadata to Non-MARC Metadata, Language specialists
Boaz for some items we just need to understand but nothing will ever move forward. Example: Columbia (cutting checks), separate funds.
Phase 3 ? (bullet point 4), related to operating principles- culture committee?
3.Basecamp: everything up-to-date. Desktop support group-January. When will we hear on the Alma decision?
Jim, other action items:
Cornell's Career Development week proposal
Invitation to Denuison/Kenyon