Adam, Robert, Colleen, Jim, Boaz
1.Review Charge: Jim- bullets 1&2 are related to functional groups. Functional groups are not static.
After review - we do not feel like we are straying from the charge.
2. Ordering group. Jim reviewed the changes he made to the Ordering Team charge in Basecamp.
ADAM - would like to see distinction between 1-5, 6-7, and 8. Phases need to be broken out and formalized. Robert - suggested a report could be due at end of each phase. Adam likes the idea of a pause for reflection. Phase 2, group will work with TSI, may continue with a larger group or continue to collaborate.
Action item: Jim will rewrite the proposal for the TSI Monograph Ordering Team to indicate a break between phase 1 & 2, he will notify us through via email.
What others functional groups will exist? Jim made a working list. Focusing on a inventory of processes.
Action item: Create a separate copy cataloging and original cataloging functional groups. Change the name of the "Metadata" functional group to "Non-MARC Metadata".
Boaz for some existing funtions wee just need to understand what the other is doing but probably nothing 2CUL wise will move forward. Example: Columbia (cutting checks), separate funds.
Phase 3 ? (bullet point 4), related to operating principles- culture committee?
3.Basecamp: everything up-to-date. Desktop support group-launching in January. Alma decision, we should hear by the end of December 2012.
Other action items (Jim):
Cornell’s Career Development week proposal
Invitation to Denison/Kenyon