You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 27 Next »

Error formatting macro: include: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No link could be created for 'SIMULATION:ANSYS WB - Plate With a Hole Demo - Panel'.

Plate With a Hole Tutorial - Results

Geometry / Mesh

Before we look at the solution, lets look at the mesh. It is below. You can also view the mesh by looking at the outline window and clicking on Mesh.

The first thing to notice about the plate with the hole geometry is that the domain is only a quarter of the full plate. Because there are two symmetries (x plane and y plane), the geometry can be reduced to 1/4 of the original, simplifying the solution. The domain is then separated into several subdivisions, called "elements". For each element, ANSYS approximates how each element responds to the forces and constraints acting on the domain. For areas where a concentration is likely (i.e. the hole in this situation), the mesh is refined for more accurate results.

Displacement

Okay! Now we can check our solution. Let's start by examining how the plate deformed under the load. Before you start, make sure the software is working in the same units you are by looking to the menu bar and selecting Units > US Customary (in, lbm, lbf, F, s, V, A). Now, look at the Outline window, and select "Total Deformation" under "Solution"

The colored section refers to the magnitude of the deformation (in inches) while the black outline is the undeformed geometry superimposed over the deformed model. The more red a section is, the more it has deformed while the more blue a section is, the less it has deformed. Notice that the deformation is at its highest where the load is applied, and there is no a lot of variation in the y-direction, as one intuitively expect.

Sigma_x

Now lets examine the stress in the x-direction. Look to the Outline window, then click Solution > Sigma-X

From this, you can see that most of the plate is in constant stress, and there is a stress concentration around the hole. The more red areas correspond to a high (positive) stress and the bluer areas correspond to areas of lower (negative) stress. Let's use the probe tool to compare the ANSYS simulation to what we expected from calculation. In the menu bar, click probe; this will allow you to hover over the model and it will display the stress at each point.

Start by hovering over the area far from the hole. The stress is about 200,000 psi, which is the value we would expect for a plate in tension from F/A. If you click the max tag (located next to the probe tool in the menu bar), it will locate and display the maximum stress, which is shown as 6.067E5 psi. This is about a 0.36% difference from the calculation we did in the Pre-Analysis, which is pretty good!

Sigma_r

Now let's look at the radial stresses in the plate. Look to the outline window and click Solution > Sigma-R. This will display the radial stresses.

Does this match what we expect? Let's first look at the case when

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ r \rightarrow \infty$

. As we found in the pre-calculations,

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large $lim_

Unknown macro: {r rightarrow infty}

\sigma_

Unknown macro: {r}

(r,\theta) = \sigma_

(\theta) $

. This matches the behavior seen in the simulation. From our Pre-Calculations, we also found that

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large $ lim_

Unknown macro: {r rightarrow infty}

\sigma_

Unknown macro: {r}

|_

Unknown macro: {theta = 0}

= \sigma_

Unknown macro: {o}

$

. Using the probe tool, we find that indeed at

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ \theta = 0 $

the stress is equal to 200,000 psi, which is the value

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large $ \sigma_

Unknown macro: {o}

$

. From our pre-calculations, we also found that

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large $ lim_

Unknown macro: {r rightarrow infty}

\sigma_

Unknown macro: {r}

|_{\theta = \frac

Unknown macro: {pi}

{2}} = \sigma_

Unknown macro: {o}

$

. Checking the simulation with our trusty probe tool, we find that the ANSYS simulation matches up quite nicely with our calculation.

Sigma_Theta

Now, let's compare the simulation to our pre-calculations for

Unknown macro: {latex}

\large $ \sigma_

Unknown macro: {theta}

$

.

In our pre-calculations, we determined that the theta stress is a function of theta only far from the hole. This behavior is represented in the simulation. Also, at the points such that r >> a and

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ \theta = \frac

Unknown macro: {pi}
Unknown macro: {2}

$

, the stress is equal to

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ \sigma_

Unknown macro: {o}

$

. Using a probe tool and hovering over this area, we see that the stress is indeed about F/A in the simulation. However, looking at the area when

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ \theta = 0 $

, we find that the stress from the simulation is between 1000 psi and 2000 psi, which is not at all close to the projected zero stress from our pre-calculations. This shows that there is some error associated with this model.

Tau_r_theta

Now let's look at how the simulation match our predictions for the shear stress.

In our pre-calculations, we determined that far from the hole the shear stress should be a function of theta only. This can be shown by using the probe tool a hovering over a radial line from the hole. The colors (representing higher and lower stresses) only change only as the angle changes, but not as the move away from the hole. We also found that far from the hole at

Unknown macro: {latex}

$ \theta = 0 \mbox

Unknown macro: { and }

\theta = \frac

Unknown macro: {pi}
Unknown macro: {2}

$

the stress is zero. Using the probe tool, we can see that this is indeed the case for the simulation as well.

  • No labels