You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 53 Next »

2010 Spring AguaClara Filtration Team

Abstract

The design challenge for the 2010 Spring AguaClara Filtration Team is to design a filtration system for the AguaClara water treatment plant. The filtration system must meet the following requirements: reliably treat the current AguaClara effluent water with a turbidity ranging from 5 to 10 NTU producing effluent turbidity less than 1 NTU, not require any electricity, make minimal use of specialized components that would be difficult to acquire in remote communities, and the system should be easy to construct and to maintain.

Currently, the filtration team has conducted research in four fields: stacked filtration, clear well backwash, foam filtration, and siphon-aided backwash. For each subject, we conducted a literature review of existing technology and research. We then developed initial designs based on our research and proceeded to test the fundamental theories behind our design. For example, the foam filtration sub team tested the effectiveness of foam in reducing the turbidity of the water while the clear well backwash team developed a bench scale model to test the empirical equations behind the design. Our research has led us to compile the following additional guidelines.

These are the guidelines that the filtration team will follow:

  • The operator needs to be able to observe the backwash process, so the filter media must be visible. This is likely to be impossible with pressure filters.
  • The improvement in water quality from filtration is perceived by the community to be small compared to the improvement from the flocculation and sedimentation processes, so the filters need to be less expensive than the flocculation and sedimentation equipment.
  • A large tank to hold water for backwashing is not economically feasible.
  • The distribution tank is not a viable source of water for backwashing because it is impossible to guarantee that there will be enough water in the distribution tank.
  • Many of the communities that will be using our water treatment plants do not have enough water to meet their needs, so the quantity of water that is wasted to clean the filters must be minimized. Stacked filtration and foam filtration may be good options for achieving this.
  • If we can't use stored water for backwash, then the maximum flow of water required for backwash must be at most 50% of the design plant flow rate. This will make it possible to run the water treatment plant at a lower than design flow rate and still be able to operate the filters. This requirement means that if we use 7 filters to backwash 1 filter, that we would need to have another set of 8 filters that could potentially be turned off so that plant could function at 50% of design flow capacity. The requirement of being able to backwash at 50% of design flow rate makes the option of using multiple filters to backwash a filter impractical.
  • All of the basic principles of AguaClara apply to the filtration research. All of the basic principles of AguaClara apply to the filtration research. These include not using electricity, using inexpensive and easily obtainable materials, and teaching the local people how to build, operate, and maintain the plants.

Conventional Filtration

There are many requirements with conventional filtration methods that make them incompatible with AguaClara. This section illustrates some of those incompatibilities.

Method & Result and Discussions for each sub team

Siphon-Aided Backwash

The goal of our research is to evaluate the feasibility of a siphon-aided backwash design to be used for a sand or mixed-media down-flow filter. The benefits of siphon-aided backwash are:
1) The height of the clear-well does not need to be equal to the the head pressure required to attain 30%-50% expansion.
2) The filter bed can be right next to the clear-well, connected via an open pipe without a valve. Flow of water into and out of the clear-well will be controlled by valves on the influent and backwash manifolds.
3) Using 55 gallon HDPE barrels, we will create a system of parallel filters surrounding a shared clear-well. By backwashing the filters out of phase, we will reduce the demand for a large clear-well. Additionally, the downflow filters will be filling the clear-well while the other filters being backwashed draw from it. This allows faster clear-well recharge rates and shortens the time between consecutive backwash cycles.

We are discontinuing research of the Sipon-Aided Backwash for the following reasons. It is a pressurized system which prevents the operator from properly observing the operation of the system. It is not economically feasible because it requires either the construction of one large clear well or multiple smaller clear wells. The filtration system itself would require the construction of one large or multiple small filtration systems.

Foam Filtration

Currently, an AguaClara plant can produce effluent water after sedimentation with a turbidity of about 5 NTU. Our goal is to reduce the effluent turbidity to less than 1 NTU. One potential method of accomplishing this is adding a filtration unit to the AguaClara plants.

Numerous techniques of water filtration are in use today, most of which involve the use of sand as the porous media. After preliminary research revealed a lack of information on foam filtration, our team has decided to focus on investigating the actual filtering capacity of a polyurethane foam material as opposed to the traditional method of sand filtration. With proper implementation, a foam filter could reduce the amount of water that is wasted during the backwash cycle of a traditional sand filter. A foam filter could also potentially require less area, and be less expensive to build than a traditional sand filter.

Clear Well Backwash Filtration System

The elevation of the clear well is between that of the filter beds and the effluent source of the sedimentation tank. During normal operation, this elevation difference allows effluent from the sedimentation tank to flow through the filter and subsequently distribute. Backwash requires approximately ten times the flow rate as normal operation. Backwash is accomplished by closing the valve leading to the distribution lines whereby water accumulates in the filter beds until the head difference between the clear well is sufficient and filtered water accumulates in the clear well.

We based our initial design on empirical granular filtration equations from existing literature on granular filtration. A bench-scale model of our system was built and tested to observe the discrepancy between the actual and the calculated fluidization velocity required to achieve a target bed expansion. We noted an increasing difference between those two sets of values that prompted us to hypothesize that, if we were to base our design on these empirical equations, we need to implement a significant safety factor. Further experiments are needed before we can conclude whether or not our design is feasible.

Figure 1: Clear Well Filtration Design

We are discontinuing research of the Sipon-Aided Backwash for the following reasons. It is a pressurized system which prevents the operator from properly observing the operation of the system. It is not economically feasible because it requires either the construction of one large clear well or multiple smaller clear wells. The filtration system itself would require the construction of one large or multiple small filtration systems.

Stacked Filtration System

So far, we have created a preliminary design for a stacked filtration system for the Agalteca Plant. It is a granular, down flow filtration system consisting of four separate rapid sand filtration units. The basic concept of our design is to make the backwash flow rate equal the filtration flow rate in order to use the effluent water from the sedimentation tank to backwash. We have chosen this concept because of the following benefits:
1) Relatively small size of the entire filtration system compared to other granular filtration systems researched.
2) Availability of the materials that would be involved in its construction.
3) Relative ease of operation.
4) If given full plant flow, the ability to conduct backwash while maintaining normal filtration operations in at least half capacity.
Each separate unit consists of 5 planes of sand filtration stacked vertically on top of each other. Each plane consists of a set of inlet tubes, 20 cm layer of sand for filtration, and a set of outlet tubes. Currently, for each layer of tubes except for the bottom layer, we have selected eighteen ½ inch PVC tubes separated by a distance ½ inches. This is most likely more PVC tubes than necessary for reasons that will be explored more in detail in the Theory section. We have selected the bottom layer of tubes to be 1 ½ inch in diameter. All of the manifold that connects to these filtration tubes except for the bottom one will be 3 inch in diameter while the bottom manifold and the rest of the pipe system of the filtration system will consist of 6 inch PVC pipes. All pipes and tubes used are schedule 40. This filter is designed for sands with typical characteristics of D60 of 0.55mm, porosity of 0.4, and specific gravity of 2.65. It will filter at rate of 1.4 mm/s and backwash at 14 mm/s with expected 30% bed expansion. It has the following dimensions as shown in Figure 1 Preliminary Design of Vertically Stacked Filtration.
The design is based on a couple of assumptions that still need to be validated with experiments.
Specifically, we still need to test the following experiments: efficiency of effluent sedimentation water to backwash the filter, efficiency of 20 cm layer of sand to filter water, clogging time of 20 cm of layer when exposed to typical sedimentation effluent water, the effect of the number of tubes per plane on filtration efficiency, bench scale model to test backwash effectiveness with regards to bed expansion and effectiveness of our backwash procedure. All of these will be covered more in detail in the Future Challenge Section.

  • No labels