You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

ANC CONTROL


Design 2010


INTRODUCTION

The Spring 2010 ANC Control team inherited the original apparatus used by the Fall 2009 team. The original design of the apparatus was giraffe-like in shape, with two 1" pipes connected at a 45 degree angle. See Figure 1.
Figure 1

In order to address the Hypothesis and also to increase the ease with which the lime is fed, our team redesigned the apparatus. We added a vertical column to the top half of the apparatus to allow for lime to simply be poured in. As the lime traveled down the vertical column, the particles would settle in the lower part of the apparatus and/or flow into the diagonal piece, but then settle out before leaving in the effluent.

The vertical column addressed the issue of feeding the lime but in order to address the other hypotheses, we decided to build two apparatuses: one with all 1" tubes, one with 1" vertical columns and 2" diagonal tubing. By doubling the diameter of the tubing, we divided the flow rate through the diagonal portion by four. This allowed for a lower capture velocity, which attempts to address the issue of lime being lost out the effluent. See Figures 2 and 3.
Figure 2

Figure 3

In designing the new apparatuses, we made the vertical column taller than the diagonal column to ensure that water would flow out the diagonal column. We determined that the head loss through the fixtures at the end of the diagonal column would be negligible. However, when we began running experiments we discovered a problem. At the end of our effluent tube, we had a candy-cane shaped piece that the water flowed through - this was in order to have the water pass over the pH probe properly (see Figure 4). However, because this resulted in a dip of the height of the water, and the water filled up the tube, the atmospheric pressure at the top of the water in the tube forced the water in the vertical column to drop to its same height (see Figure 5).
Figure 4

Figure 5

We attempted to correct this problem by sealing the top of the vertical column with a cap. This would result in a vacuum in the area about the water level and would allow the water in the column to remain at a constant height (see Figure 6). However, we were not able to fully seal the cap and having an open vertical column to pour lime directly into was part of the design's attractiveness.
Figure 6

We decided to alter the design instead by opening the very top of the diagonal column to atmospheric pressure. Doing so allowed for open channel flow in the tube and allowed the height of the water in the vertical column to remain constant, matching the height of the water level in the diagonal column. (See Figure 7)
Figure 7

Future design improvements

• Tubes: ½ " vertical  1" vertical  1" diameter
• Pumping the lime up to the top of the vertical column
• Determining how the apparatus could be incorporated into a real Agua Clara plant

Things that we would like to work on in the future would be changing the lower half of the apparatus. Throughout our experiments, we have determined that the lower vertical column is needed to keep the larger lime particles in suspension. Our experiments have shown that the smaller, finer lime particles travel up into the 2" diagonal column and are either suspended there, settle onto the lower diagonal, or travel up the upper diagonal and escape in the effluent. We would like to keep more of the lime mass suspended in the lower vertical column. One idea for achieving this would be to switch from a 1" column to a 2" column in the vertical section. (See Figure 8)
Figure 8

Another design change we are considering is the possibility of pumping the lime slurry up to the vertical column. This would make it more "user-friendly" as two of our members are not tall enough to feed the lime and thus, cannot run an experiment independently. Concerns associated with this method would be configuring Process Controller to run multiple pumps, differing flow rates for water verses lime slurry, when to pump which, and more. The pumping method also raises the issue that lime has to travel through so much tubing to reach the apparatus, providing it with a lot of surface area to settle on or coat. This will make it difficult to know exactly how much lime is actually making it into the apparatus.

One final design challenge that we need to tackle in the coming weeks is thinking about how our design could be implemented into an Agua Clara plant. Due to the height of the apparatus, it may be necessary to have the bottom rest below the floor where the operator would be walking. If the apparatus started at the lower level of the sedimentation tank (or floc tank) and then rose above ground to expose the vertical and diagonal columns, it might be at an appropriate height for the operator to feed the lime manually (without a ladder).

  • No labels