Theoretical Analysis of the Velocity Gradient
When an incompressible fluid flows through a cylindrical tube its velocity relative to the walls changes as a function of the tube radius. In general, this velocity distribution is parabolic: the greatest velocities are achieved at the center of the tube (where R=0) eventually tapering off to 0 at the walls. The parabolic nature of the distribution arises from cylindrical symmetry as well as the fact that the fluid does not move at the walls (the "no-slip" condition).
This gradient in the velocity profile contibutes to the force that a floc experiencing roll-up feels. Flocs actually begin to roll up when the velocity at their edge exposed to the flow exceeds some critical value, which is highly dependent on the floc's diameter, its density, and the capture velocity of the system, among other things.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Floc Roll up picture.png) not found.
Applying a force balance to this:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
\sum
Unknown macro: {F = 0}
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
F_b + F_d - mg\sin (\theta ) = 0
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
- mg\sin \theta + \rho w gV
Unknown macro: {proj}{{V^2 } \over 2}
\sin \theta + \rho w C_D A
$$
Solving this equation for the velocity:
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{{V^2 } \over 2}\rho w C_D A
Unknown macro: {proj}
= \rho p V
g\sin \theta - \rho w gV
Unknown macro: {proj}
\sin \theta
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V^2 = {{2g\sin \theta V_
Unknown macro: {proj}
} \over {\rho w C_D A
}}(\rho _p - \rho _w )
$$
For the purposes of this approximation, it is assumed the floc's diameter can be modeled as a sphere.
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{{V_
Unknown macro: {proj}
} \over {A_
}} = {{\pi d_p ^3 } \over 6 \over {{
Unknown macro: {pi d_p ^2 }
\over 4}}} =
Unknown macro: {2 over 3}
d_p
$$
Assuming that the flow through the tube settlers is creeping flow (Re <<1), we can approximate the drag coefficient as 24/Re:
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V = \sqrt {{4 \over {72}}g\sin (\theta )d_p {\mathop
Unknown macro: {rm Re}
\nolimits} {{(\rho _p - \rho _w )} \over
Unknown macro: {rho _w }
}}
$$
At this velocity a floc that is sitting on the bottom wall of the tube settler should not move. We should call this something like the critical or failure velocity, since velocity values greater than this quantity (at the edge of the floc exposed to the flow) will cause roll-up.
.
VELOCITY GRADIENT ANALYSIS
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
After integration
$$
Unknown macro: {1 over r}
{\partial \over {\partial r}}(r{{\partial v_z } \over {\partial r}}) =
Unknown macro: {1 over mu }
(\partial P} \over {\partial z)r
$$
.
Integrate again
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
r{{\partial v_z } \over {\partial r}} = {1 \over {2\mu }}(\partial P} \over {\partial z)r^2 + c_1
$$
.
This constant of integration should be zero, since we want the velocity of the center of the tube to be finite. Dividing through by r---
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
\partial v_z } \over {\partial r = {1 \over {2\mu }}(\partial P} \over {\partial z)r
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
\partial P} \over {\partial z = {{\Delta P} \over L}
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_
Unknown macro: {av}
= R^2 \Delta P} \over {8\mu L = {Q \over {\pi R^2 }}
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{{\Delta P} \over L} = {{Q8\mu } \over {\pi R^4 }}
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
\partial v_z } \over {\partial r = {1 \over {2\mu }}{{Q8\mu } \over {\pi R^4 }}r
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
\partial v_z } \over {\partial r = {{4Q} \over {\pi R^4 }}r
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_z (r) = {{2Q} \over {\pi R^2 }}[(
Unknown macro: {r over R}
)^2 - 1] = {{2Q} \over {A_
Unknown macro: {tube}
}}[(
)^2 - 1]
$$
.
Finally:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_z (r) = 2V_
Unknown macro: {av}
[(
Unknown macro: {r over R}
)^2 - 1]
$$
.
Now, we can evaluate the velocity at the "failure point," which for this approximation is equal to the radius of the tube minus the diameter of the floc particle.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_z ({\rm{R}}_{{\rm
Unknown macro: {tube}
}} {\rm{ - d}}{\rm{p}} ) = 2V
Unknown macro: {av}
[({\rm{R_{{\rm
}} {\rm{ - d}}_{\rm{p}} } \over R})^2 - 1]
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_z (P_f ) = 2V_
Unknown macro: {av}
[({\rm{R_{{\rm
Unknown macro: {tube}
}} - d_p } \over R})^2 ] = V_f
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
V_f = \sqrt {{4 \over {72}}g\sin (\theta )d_p {\mathop
Unknown macro: {rm Re}
\nolimits} {{(\rho _p - \rho _w )} \over
Unknown macro: {rho _w }
}}
$$
.
When the velocity at the critical point exceeds the failure velocity, roll-up occurs. This suggests an inequality of the form:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
2V_
Unknown macro: {av}
[({\rm{R_{{\rm
Unknown macro: {tube}
}} - d_p } \over R})^2 ] > \sqrt {{4 \over {72}}g\sin (\theta )d_p {\mathop
Unknown macro: {rm Re}
\nolimits} {{(\rho _p - \rho _w )} \over
Unknown macro: {rho _w }
}}
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
Solving this inequality for the diameter of the particle allows us to generate a function that will allow us to analyze roll-up in terms of a critical floc diameter. This equation actually happens to be cubic in the diameter of the floc and has the following form:
\large
$$
{\rm{F(}}d_p ) = c_1 d_p ^3 - c_2 d_p ^2 + c_3 d_p - \omega
$$
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{\rm{F(}}d_p ) = (
Unknown macro: {1 over R}
)d_p ^3 - 4d_p ^2 + (4R^2 +
- 2)d_p - g\sin (\theta ){\mathop
Unknown macro: {rm Re}
\nolimits} {{(\rho p - \rho _w )} \over {\rho _w }}{{A
Unknown macro: {tube}
^2 } \over {Q^2 }}
$$
.
The coefficients in this function are only functions of the radius of the tube, and an analysis of how they change with the radius could possibly give some physical insight into the phenomenon of floc roll-up as it relates to the geometry of the tube settlers.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{\rm{F(}}d_p ) < 0
$$
No roll-up.
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{\rm{F(}}d_p ) = 0
$$
This is the critical diameter at which a floc will not move.
.
Unknown macro: {latex}
\large
$$
{\rm{F(}}d_p ) > 0
$$
Roll-up occurs.
.
During Spring 2009 the Plate Settler Spacing team first identified the roll-up phenomenon, and their subsequent analysis is centered around a critical velocity gradient occuring at the walls of the tube settler. While this analysis provides reasonable data, the fundamental force balance has steered the Summer 2009 team in a direction that is more focused on the physical properties of the floc as they relate to roll-up. This is beneficial because a model based entirely on the velocity gradient may lend itself to difficulty in calculations, since this gradient could very well depend on the influent water turbidity and chemistry.
It might be useful to analyze the final cubic function's behavior around its inflection points – these may indicate critical values or "states" the system moves through as the capture velocity changes.
During Spring 2009 the Plate Settler Spacing team first identified the roll-up phenomenon, and their subsequent analysis is centered around a critical velocity gradient occuring at the walls of the tube settler. While this analysis provides reasonable data, the fundamental force balance has steered the Summer 2009 team in a direction that is more focused on the physical properties of the floc as they relate to roll-up. This is beneficial because a model based entirely on the velocity gradient may lend itself to difficulty in calculations, since this gradient could very well depend on the influent water turbidity and chemistry.
It might be useful to analyze the final cubic function's behavior around its inflection points – these may indicate critical values or "states" the system moves through as the capture velocity changes.