You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Experiment 4: Alum dose = 15 mg/L

This is an underdose. These graphs show the effluent turbidity plotted against time for capture velocities of 0.058, 0.116, 0.174, and 0.231 mm/sec.

Figure 1: Effluent Turbidity vs. Time for Floc Blanket on low, alum dose = 15 mg/L


Figure 2: Effluent Turbidity vs. Time for Floc Blanket on high, alum dose = 15 mg/L

Conclusions

The floc blanket formed for this alum dose unexpectedly performed well. This dosage is an extreme underdose, and this experiment was run to demonstrate failure, which was not acheived.

The reason that this dosage was successful is that the floc blanket was still able to form. An underdosed system forms flocs that are smaller, which creates a floc blanket that is more dense. As a result of the smaller flocs, the floc blanket takes more time to form since more flocs are required to fill the space in the tank. From the graph, it is clear that the floc blanket was not fully formed in the beginning of the 0.058 mm/sec capture velocity, because the effluent turbidity has a high spike. However, the turbidity ultimately falls back within the acceptable range. This can be interpreted as the point at which the floc blanket is completely formed. Thus, as a result of this observation, it is clear that once the floc blanket is formed, regardless of the alum dosage, the ultimate effluent turbidity is relatively the same. From this, we can conclude that as soon as the floc blanket is sufficiently formed, which will occur more quickly with a higher alum dose, the dosage can be lowered. This conclusion is significant because the overall amount of alum needed to treat the water can be reduced.

  • No labels