You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

The spring 2009 plate settler spacing experiments were run using the process controller software developed by Dr. Weber-Shirk. Our experimental apparatus consisted of four peristaltic pumps, two electric stirrers, one stir-plate, two turbidimeters, one pressure sensor, one solenoid valve, and one pinch valve: all of which were directly controlled by process controller.

*The process controller method for the PSS flow rate experiment can be found here

The following is an overview of how we utilized this software for our apparatus.

States, Set points, and Rules

The process controller software runs based on states, set points, and rules that are inputted by the user: states define the general activity of the system at any given moment; set points are parameters that define the state of the system in greater detail; and rules define the circumstances under which a state occurs.

For example, our process controller method defined two states: "Mix" and "Floc Blanket Formation". The "Floc Blanket Formation" state was characterized by certain flow rates for the influent, alum, and water through the upflow clarifier. These flow rates were the set points. An example of a rule would be:

If the time spent in "Mix" is greater than "x", go to "Floc Blanket Formation".

This rule facilitates a switch from the "Mix" state to the "Floc Blanket Formation" state based on the time set point "x".

Varying Flow Rates and Floc Blanket Height

In order to run the system continuously while varying flow rates and floc blanket height, we organized our process controller method into two loops: the first loop to increment flow rates at the low floc blanket height, and the second loop to increment flow rates at the high floc blanket height.

To do this, we used increment and counting functions. The increment function toggled between consecutive flow rates and a reset state; while the counting function regulated the number of flow rates incremented and directed the path of the system appropriately. For example, once the counting function identified that the reset state had been employed four times, the system was sent to a new state after the fifth flow rate.

  • No labels