Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

The nonlinear doser uses a dosing orifice (minor losses) instead of a dosing tube (major losses) to control the relationship between changing plant flow rates and chemical dose. The flow rate through the CDC is related to the available head by the equation:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$Q_{Cdc}  = K_{orifice}\sqrt {2gh_{Cdc} } $${latex}

where

  • Latex
    Wiki Markup
    {latex}$$Q_{Cdc} $${latex}
    is the chemical flow rate
  • Latex
    Wiki Markup
    {latex}$$ K_{orifice} $${latex}
    is the orifice coefficient
  • h is the available head

The entrance to the rapid mix tank is a rectangular orifice. The relationship between flow rate and head is governed by the equation:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$ Q_{Plant}  = K_{orifice} \sqrt {2gh_{EtOrifice} } $${latex}

where

  • Latex
    Wiki Markup
    {latex}$$ Q_{Plant}$${latex}
    is the plant flow rate
  • Latex
    Wiki Markup
    {latex}$$ h_{EtOrifice} $${latex}
    is the height of water above the entrance tank orfice

The chemical dose to the plant can be determined by a simple mass balance:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$C_p  = {{C_c Q_{Cdc} } \over {Q_{Plant} }}$${latex}

where

  • C c is the chemical stock concentration
  • C p is the chemical dose

...

The dosing tube must be designed to minimize major losses so that the major losses that deviate from the

Wiki Markup
Latex
{latex}$$V = \sqrt {2gh}$${latex}
relationship do not cause excessive errors. The deviation from
Wiki Markup
Latex
{latex}$$V = \sqrt {2gh}$${latex}
is especially significant when the flow through the dosing tube becomes laminar. The dosing tube must be flexible to accommodate the lever arm motion and dose adjustment. The flow conduit used to transport the chemical flow from the orifice to the place where it is mixed with the plant flow must still be designed. The flow conduit must be designed such that the pressure is atmospheric at the exit of the dose control orifice.

...

The dosing orifice is designed to produce the difference in head loss between the maximum CDC head loss and the actual head loss in the flexible dosing tube:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$
h_l  = K_{DoseOrifice} {{V_{DoseTube}^2 } \over {2g}}
$${latex}

where

  • h l the difference in head loss between the maximum CDC head loss and the actual head loss in the flexible dosing tube
  • K DoseOrifice is the required minor loss coefficient through the orifice
  • V DoseTube is the velocity in the dosing tube

This head loss is equal to head loss in the vena contracta. Head loss in the vena contracta is modeled by the equation:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$h_l  = K_{Exit} {{V_{VenaContracta}^2 } \over {2g}}$${latex}

where

  • h l is the head loss
  • Latex
    Wiki Markup
    {latex}$$ K_{Exit}$${latex}
    is the minor loss coefficient from an exit to the atmosphere
  • V VenaContracta is the velocity in the orifice vena contracta

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$ K_{Exit}$${latex}
is equal to one. The flow rate through the dosing tube is known and velocities in the vena contracta can be found using mass conservation:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$A_{DoseTube} V_{DoseTube}  = K_{Orifice} A_{DoseOrifice} V_{DoseOrifice} $${latex}

where

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$ K_{Orifice}$${latex}
is the orifice vena contracta coefficient equal to 0.63. Using the three equations above a relationship for the velocities can be found:

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$$
K_{DoseOrifice}  = \left[ {{1 \over {K_{Orifice} }}\left( {{{V_{DoseTube} } \over {V_{DoseOrifice} }}} \right)^2 } \right]^2 
$${latex}

The chemical dose flow rate is not exactly proportional to the plant flow rate due to different exponential relationships between flow and head loss for the major losses. These differences arise from two sources. The most significant difference occurs when the flow in the dosing tube is laminar and thus the flow rate is proportional to the major head loss rather than to the square root of the head loss. The other source of error occurs for transitional flow where the friction factor decreases with increasing Reynolds number.

...

The nonlinear relationship between flow and head loss makes it more difficult to accurately control the chemical dose when the dose is low.

Latex
Wiki Markup
{latex}$${{HL_{Cdc_{Min} } } \over {HL_{Cdc_{\max } } }} = \left( {{{Q_{Cdc_{Min} } } \over {Q_{Cdc_{\max } } }}} \right)^2 $${latex}

For this reason it is recommended that the total head loss range be increased to approximately 50 cm for the nonlinear CDC. For a chemical dose that is 10% of the maximum chemical dose the head required by the dosing tube is 1% of the maximum head loss (0.5 cm). Maintaining a positioning error of less than 0.5 cm may be difficult and would require a large float to minimize errors due to changes in moment caused by the dosing tube. The CDC lever must also be accurately calibrated to minimize errors at low chemical dosing rates. Thus the maximum head loss for the CDC should be at least 50 cm.

...