...
...
...
| 2D Steady Conduction - Panel |
---|
|
...
| 2D Steady Conduction - Panel |
---|
|
Image Added
Verification
...
Overview
HTML |
---|
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9RKcXN6xkD4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Check Your Understanding
Select true or false.
Verification involves comparison with experimental data.
(To see the answer, go to the 2D Conduction section of Module 1 in
New window link |
---|
Link | https://courses.edx.org/courses/course-v1:CornellX+ENGR2000X+1T2017/course/ |
---|
|
our free online course on ANSYS simulations. |
You need to sign in to edX.org to access the course.)Check Energy Conservation
HTML |
---|
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DvWdFGyKvA4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Check Numerical Error
HTML |
---|
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pyvOziL5mso" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Verification and validation can be thought as a formal process for checking results. Each of these terms has a specific meaning which we won't get into here. The only verification check discussed below is the effect of mesh refinement.
Refine Mesh
To change the mesh size, go back to Mesh > Edge Sizing in the tree and change the Number of Divisions appropriately. Click Solve. All results will be updated for the new mesh. Then, export the results for the temperature along the y=1 path to Excel or MATLAB. In Excel or MATLAB, make a plot showing T vs. x along y=1 for different meshes. You should find that the temperature variation along this line becomes independent of the mesh as the mesh gets finer. In fact, for this problem, it turns out we don't need a lot of elements to get a result that is nearly independent of the mesh.
Go to Exercises
Go to all ANSYS Learning Modules