Nonlinear Chemical Dose Controller Fall 2008-Summer 2009

Abstract

...

Image Removed

Figure 1: Nonlinear CD Design

{float:right|border=2px solid black|width=400px}
!Non-linear CDC Design1.jpg|width=400px,align=top!
h5. Figure 1: Draft nonlinear chemical dose controller design.
{float}

The nonlinear chemical dose controller (CDCThe nonlinear chemical doser (CD) is designed for turbulent chemical does flow rates. The previous CD design for a linear CD dose flow rates to be used in conjunction with the Rapid Mix Chamber Design in contrast to the linear CDC which requires that the chemical flow in the dosing tube be is laminar. This The linear CD-design- CDC uses the relationship between laminar flow and major losses in the doser tube to maintain a constant chemical dose with varying plant flow rates. However, when the flow in the dosing tube is turbulent, the linear relationship no logner longer exists. In this case, a nonlinear CDCDC, one that uses a combination of major and minor losses to control flow rates, is necessary can be used to maintain a constant chemical dose with the varying plant flow rates.

...

By using an orifice to control chemical flow, the CDC will have the same nonlinear response to increasing flow as the plant flow rate which is controlled by a rectangular orifice. A float in the entrance tank controls the height of a lever arm. The dosing orifice is located at the opposite end of the lever arm. As plant flow rates increase, the float rises, and the dosing orifice falls making more head available to power chemical flow. As the flow rate decreases so does the available head and the chemical flow rate slows down. The lever arm has holes drilled into the top of it so that the dosing orifice may be inserted into one of these holes to adjust dosage for changes in turbidity. Since the dosing orifice flows directly into the lever arm, the alum will always be dispersed into the same spot, no matter the dose.

The advantage to designing a nonlinear CD CDC is that higher chemical flow rates can be used. With an alum stock solution of 500 g/L the linear flow controller can deliver a maximum chemical dose of 90 mg/L to plants with flow rates as high as 2000 L/min. In larger water treatment plants larger higher chemical flow rates are necessary to dose alum and chlorine. The limit of the currentlinear flow control module is 400 ml/min. This maximum flow has been adequate for the plants currently in operation (A flow controller with a higher capacity than the linear CDC flow controller is necessary for the nonlinear CDC. Head loss through the float valve orifice limits the Flow Controller to chemical flows less than 400 mL/min. Otherwise; the chemical stock tank needs to be placed excessively far above the flow controller float valve. This maximum chemical flow is adequate for La 34, Ojojona, Tamara, Marcala and Four communities) Cuatro Comunidades given their flow rates. Panel It was necessary to use two flow controllers Two flow controllers working in parallel are used to achieve the necessary alum dose at Marcala. As the demand for larger AguaClara plants grows, larger chemical dose flow rates will be required. Furthermore, at high chemical flow rates, the head loss through the flow control module orifice requires that the chemical stock tank be elevated to an unreasonable height.

Methods

.

Theory

The The nonlinear doser uses a dose control dosing orifice (minor losses) instead of a dosing tube (major losses) to control the relationship between changing plant flow rates and chemical dose. The flow rate through the CDC is related to the available head by the equation:

$$Q_{Cdc}  = K_{orifice}\sqrt {2gh_{Cdc} } $$

where

• Latex
  $$Q_{Cdc} $$

  is the chemical flow rate

• Latex
  $$ K_{orifice} $$

  is the orifice coefficient
• h is the available head

The entrance to the rapid mix tank is also an orifice. Therefore, the relationship the total plant flow rate and a rectangular orifice. The relationship between flow rate and head is governed by the equation:

$$ Q_{Plant}  = K_{orifice} \sqrt {2gh_{EtOrifice} } $$

where

• Latex
  $$ Q_{Plant}$$

  is the plant flow rate

• Latex
  $$ h_{EtOrifice} $$

  is the height of water

...

• above the entrance tank orfice

The chemical dose to the plant can be determined by a simple mass balance:

$$C_p  = {{C_c Q_{Cdc} } \over {Q_{Plant} }}$$

where

• C _c is the chemical stock concentration
• C _p is the chemical dose

The CDC uses a lever arm to relate head above the centerline of the rectangular plant entrance orifice to head in the dosing orifice. This means that the available head for the dosing orifice is the same as the head controlling the plant flow rate and the relationship between the chemical flow rateboth plant and chemical flow rates are dominantly controlled by an orifice. The CD uses a lever arm to increase head in the flow control module when the plant flow rate increase. The increase in head drives links the chemical flow rate to increase with the plant flow rate . The relationship between chemical dose and turbidity is changed manually in the same fashion as for the linear CD.and the chemical dose will be constant as plant flow varies as long as the exponent of the head is the same for both the plant flow and the chemical flow.

The dosing tube must be designed to minimize major losses so that the major losses that deviate from the

$$V = \sqrt {2gh}$$

$$V = \sqrt {2gh}$$

...

Image Removed

Figure 2: Flow Controller for Nonlinear module

To reduce head loss through the flow control module orifice, a new flow controller is being used in the design. The module being used is a PT 75 LS Kerick Valve. This valve was chosen to minimize flow control module size and maximize orifice area. The flow controller will be housed mounted in a square tub.

...

.

Methods

Flexible Dosing Tube

The dosing tube diameter is based on the minimum available diameter that will have a head loss less than the given fraction of the maximum CDC head loss under conditions of the maximum chemical flow rate.

Dosing Orifice

The dosing orifice is designed to produce the difference in head loss between the maximum CDC head loss and the actual head loss in the flexible dosing tube:

$$
h_l  = K_{DoseOrifice} {{V_{DoseTube}^2 } \over {2g}}
$$

where

• h _l the difference in head loss between the maximum CDC head loss and the actual head loss in the flexible dosing tube
• K _DoseOrifice is the required minor loss coefficient through the orifice
• V _DoseTube is the velocity in the dosing tube

This head loss is equal to head loss in the vena contracta. Head loss in the vena contracta is modeled by the equation:

$$h_l  = K_{Exit} {{V_{VenaContracta}^2 } \over {2g}}$$

where

• h _l is the head loss

• Latex
  $$ K_{Exit}$$

  is the minor loss coefficient from an exit to the atmosphere
• V _{VenaContracta} is the velocity in the orifice vena contracta

$$ K_{Exit}$$

$$A_{DoseTube} V_{DoseTube}  = K_{Orifice} A_{DoseOrifice} V_{DoseOrifice} $$

where

$$ K_{Orifice}$$

$$
K_{DoseOrifice}  = \left[ {{1 \over {K_{Orifice} }}\left( {{{V_{DoseTube} } \over {V_{DoseOrifice} }}} \right)^2 } \right]^2 
$$

The chemical dose flow rate is not exactly proportional to the plant flow rate due to different exponential relationships between flow and head loss for the major losses. These differences arise from two sources. The most significant difference occurs when the flow in the dosing tube is laminar and thus the flow rate is proportional to the major head loss rather than to the square root of the head loss. The other source of error occurs for transitional flow where the friction factor decreases with increasing Reynolds number.

{float:right|border=2px solid black|width=400px}
!Chem dose error (QPlant).png|width=400px,align=top!
h5. Figure 2: Dosing error from the nonlinear CDC for two maximum flow rates and for two chemical doses. The conditions were: 1 m long dosing tube, CDC head loss of 50 cm, major losses constrained to less than 10% of total head loss, stock concentration of 120 g/L, maximum chemical dose of 60 mg/L, and minimum plant flow that could be measured by the plant flow orifice was 20%. The [MathCAD file is attached|Nonlinear Chemical Dose Controller Fall08-Summer09^Nonlinear CD.xmcd].
{float}

The error due to the major loss contribution to the head loss is shown in figure 2. The error is most significant for low chemical flow rates. The error can be reduced by decreasing the major losses, but that requires the use of larger dosing tubes.

The nonlinear relationship between flow and head loss makes it more difficult to accurately control the chemical dose when the dose is low.

$${{HL_{Cdc_{Min} } } \over {HL_{Cdc_{\max } } }} = \left( {{{Q_{Cdc_{Min} } } \over {Q_{Cdc_{\max } } }}} \right)^2 $$

Viscosity of Alum

{float:right|border=2px solid black|width=400px}
[!alum viscosity.png|width=400px,align=top!|^Density and Kinematic viscosity of Alum.xmcd]
h5. Figure 3: Viscosity of Alum.
{float}

The viscosity of alum is only slightly larger than that of water for concentrations used in stock solutions (Figure 3). At concentrations above 550 g/L the viscosity increases rapidly and thus concentrations above 550 g/L should be avoided when using hydraulic flow control.

Lever Arm and Float

Since the head loss range required to accurately control the chemical dose at low chemical dosages is at least 50 cm, the length of the lever arm must be sufficient to handle that vertical motion.

Refer to LeverArmLength to determine a lever arm length and the maximum angle to use for a given elevation difference

The size of the float can be determined using a moment balance around the pivot of the lever arm. This is to ensure that a change of 20 cm in head in the entrance tank will cause a similar change in the relative height of the float. The float was sized using the same float sizing algorithm used by the linear CDC. For flows between 600 and 25,000 L/min the float diameter ranged between 6 and 16 in.

Flow Control module

{float:left|border=2px solid black|width=200px}
!NonlinearFCM.jpg|thumbnail,align=top!
h5.  Figure 4: Flow Controller for Nonlinear module
{float}

When choosing what size float valve to use, the constraints are the maximum flow rate through the valve, the allowable head loss through the valve, and the size of the valve orifice. The allowable head loss through the valve is kept small to avoid excessively elevated stock tanks for alum and chlorine. Various valve orifices sizes are available. Note that the inlet sizes given (a pipe thread size) are not the orifice dimension.

Functional Range

The functional range is limited by the float valve orifice. The largest float valve manufactured by Kerick Valve has an orifice of 2.54 cm (1 inch). With a head loss of 30 cm the flow rate would be 0.77 L/s and the corresponding plant flow rate could be as high as 6000 L/s.