h1. Rotameter Head Loss Experiment
h2.
!Rotameter Experiment.JPG|border=2px solid black,align=center,width=500px|align=center,width=500px,height=350px!
{float}
{center:class=myclass}h5.Figure 1: Experimental Setup{center}
h3. Overview
A rotameter can be included between the alum stock tank and the constant head tank in the dose controller to verify the flow rate of chemical. The head loss through the rotameter needs to be determined in order to perform an accurate energy balance on the dose controller to provide precise dosing.
h3. Experimental Setup
The head loss through the rotameter was be determined using the setup that is diagrammed in Figure 1. A peristalic pump was used to circulate the fluid at a certain flow rate. Two attenuators were used to minimize the effect of the pulsing from the peristalic pump, and one pressure sensor was used to measure the pressure difference before and after the rotameter.
A ramp function in process controller was used to control the flow rate of the circulating fluid. The flow rate was gradually increased from 8 ml/min to 380 ml/min.
The head loss was be determined by performing an energy balance around the rotameter. The pressure reading from the standing water is subtracted from the measured pressure difference values to cancel out the height term. The resulting pressure difference corresponds directly to head loss of the rotameter.
h3. Results
One experiment looked at the response of the rotameter to flow rates of 8 to 380 mL/min. As seen in Figures 2 and 3, the experimental data fit best to a 0.09 in orifice with a 2 cm offset in pressure. This 2 cm of extra head needed to fit the 0.09 in orifice model has been hypothesized to be caused by the energy needed to lift the ball float.
!3.09.10 Full Flow.jpg|align=center,width=500px,height=350px!
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 2: Full Flow Experiment #1 (3/09/10): 8-380 mL/min{center}
!3.11.10 Full Flow.jpg|align=center,width=500px,height=350px!
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 3: Full Flow Experiment #2 (3/11/10): 8-380 mL/min{center}
\\
In Figures 2 and 3 there is also a seemingly linear response in the data at low flow rates. Another experiment was performed at 8 to 40 mL/min flow rates to determine if this was indeed linear.
!3.11.10 Low Flow.jpg|align=center,width=500px,height=350px!
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 4: Low Flow Experiment #1 (3/11/10): 8-40 mL/min{center}
\\
!3.12.10 Low Flow.jpg|align=center,width=500px,height=350px!
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 5: Low Flow Experiment #2 (3/12/10): 8-40 mL/min{center}
\\
From the data, it seems that there is a linear response at low flow rates until about 25-30-35 mL/min.
h3. Conclusions/Future Work | 