Intota – Reality check for assessment of Intota
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N33uLgxuNUevku1TOaHClY9pUcdapFk5TQxiyTJcqko/edit
License data – Let’s continue our discussions about updating and entering licenses into RM. Liisa and I started this document:
- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yTR8-d0Om-tplRbOCzNYikSqdR6ZWXWzXEJLOVnpQro/edit?usp=sharin
- This includes all of the fields that are available in RM license records. We want to get some consensus about:
- What fields do we care about, what ones can we ignore.
- Is there data we want to include that there is not an official field for, e.g. Text/Data mining provision?
- Are there any standards we should agree to, e.g. naming conventions, etc…
- Then use that to:
- Develop a coversheet/checklist for license review.
- Select a few licenses to start with that we should have identical agreements, like Springer, etc… to begin reviewing and seeing if we agree on what some interpretations might be.