JSMIN, 2013-10-28 to 2013-11-01

JSMIN Meeting Notes, Monday 10/28

Attending: Adam, Sarah, Kate, Jesse (for Bill), Jim, Colleen, Boaz, Naun, Robert, Mark

Housekeeping:

• For this initial sprint of JSMIN work, we reaffirmed the idea of determining day-to-day whether to hold or cancel the next day's standing 12:00-1:30 session.  We also decided that a minimum of three participants from each institution would constitute a quorum, along with the appropriate JSMIN members for the agenda topic at hand, plus either Kate or Jim.
• Given technical difficulties with today's WebEx (which closed Joyce out of the discussion), we decided to discuss the Original Cataloging Working Group's ideas and recommendations, rather than Monograph Ordering as originally planned

Original Cataloging: Review of Recommendations, Ideas, and Suggestions

1. "The Original and Copy Cataloging groups held joint discussions during Phase 1 and we recommend combining these two groups for Phase 2. This group will need to work closely with the acquisitions and batch processing groups to make recommendations on workflow and related issues such as cross-training." We gave a GREEN LIGHT to this proposal to combine the Original and Copy Cataloging Working Groups for Phase 2, and agreed with the observation that this team will need to work closely with acquisitions and batch processing working groups on issues related to workflow, cross-training, etc.
2. "Training (and, where appropriate, documentation)."  We gave a GREEN LIGHT to moving forward (continuing, actually) with consolidated training for 2CUL catalogers on an "opportunistic" basis.  A YELLOW LIGHT to developing shared documentation, pending the development of a TSI shared documentation methodology.
3. "Developing guidelines for collaborative cataloging covering such areas as balancing demand and capacity, workflow and hand-offs, clarifying expectations, communication, etc."  GREEN LIGHT.  No problem moving forward together in this area, with the caveat that some guidelines and decisions may require, or at least benefit from, input from JSMIN (in particular, the departmental directors).

********************

JSMIN Meeting Notes, Tuesday 10/29

Attending: Adam, Naun, Jesse (for Bill), Boaz, Jim, Joyce, Kate, Sarah, Colleen, Robert, Mark

Original Cataloging -- Review of Recommendations, Ideas, and Suggestions (contd.) --

1. "Identifying areas where changing collection priorities (e.g. as a result of collaborative collection development) may have an impact on cataloging workload."  RED LIGHT: requires further discussion to determine who should own this issue.
2. "Identifying and evaluating vendor services of potential interest, e.g. vendor-supplied cataloging, shelf-ready processing, vernacular data, etc.This may progress to joint negotiations with vendors and establishing common service expectations."  RED LIGHT: requires further discussion to determine who should own this issue.
3. "Representation on external bodies (e.g. CONSER) and associated activities including reporting and voting."  GREEN LIGHT.
4. "Joint policy and standards development: this needs to take place within a framework that will accommodate differences due to contrasting collection priorities and service expectations."  GREEN LIGHT.
5. "Investigating system-related services, including batch processing, reporting, troubleshooting, and their impact on workflow."  YELLOW LIGHT: may be covered by other groups.

Acquisitions: Monograph Ordering -- Review of Recommendations, Ideas, and Suggestions

1. "Might Cornell be able to use its corporate Amazon account to order materials for Columbia?"  GREEN LIGHT to explore idea.
2. "Might Columbia selectors be able to better streamline the ordering process by making better use of the POOF interface?"  YELLOW LIGHT: request further information.
3. "Might the two institutions be able to share one ordering specialist for more difficult/challenging-to-obtain items?"  GREEN LIGHT to explore idea.

Acquisitions: Monograph Receiving -- Review of Recommendations, Ideas, and Suggestions

1. Explore further use of shelf-ready option: RED LIGHT: requires further discussion to determine who should own this issue.
2. Explore further use of cataloging on receipt: RED LIGHT: requires further discussion to determine who should own this issue.
3. Examine university accounting restrictions: RED LIGHT: requires further discussion to determine who should own this issue.

For Thursday: review ideas from the Batch Processing Working Group