You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

Recirculation of flocs in settling column

Unknown macro: {composition-setup}

cloak.toggle.exclusive=false

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} Concerns">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Concerns

Unknown macro: {cloak}

The Tube Floc team observed a slow but seemingly interminable recirculation of flocs inside the settling column during the settling state of each experimental run. This recirculation was troubling because it violated our assumption that the fluid inside the settling column was quiescent enough to allow flocs to be accelerated only by gravity. Since the experimental apparatus was designed to observe floc sedimentation inside the settling column, if flocs were actually being accelerated by a recirculating flow, the data we had collected cannot be interpreted as information about floc sedimentation. This recirculation problem may be a reason for why we have not been seeing ideal settling curves as we would have expected in our results. Changes need to be made to assure that the settling column is quiescent during the settle state, or a new approach must be taken to interpret the data.

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} PossibleCauses">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Possible Causes

Unknown macro: {cloak}

Upon identifying the recirculation problem and bringing it up with Dr. Weber-Shirk, the Tube Floc team attempted to identify the cause of the recirculation problem. After weeks of diagnosing the experimental apparatus, the team was able to identify several potential causes for the recirculation:

  1. The 90 degree elbow connectors at each end of the settling column was originally thought to be the cause of the circulation because such a sharp turn was bound to introduce some vorticity into the flow. Although the recirculation occurred after the mean flow has been stopped, the redirection of momentum caused by the 90 degree bend may still have lingered and thus could have contributed to the recirculation.
  2. The connection between the 3/8 inch diameter flocculator tube and the 1/2 inch settling column has always been a source of concern. The abrupt change from small to big diameter should theoretically cause flow instabilities that could lead to the formation of turbulent eddies. Moreover, the jaggedness of the inner walls of the pipe connectors will also interrupt the stability of the flow and compound the problem. A solution to this problem would be to fabricate a cone shaped connector that could provide a smooth and very gradual transition from small to large diameter. This connector would need to have a small enough angle to the axis of the column to ensure that the adverse pressure gradient created by the increase in diameter is weak enough that it will not cause flow separation at the boundary of the pipe.
  3. We noticed that the recirculation began the moment the valves were shut off. Since the solenoid valves close very abruptly, a small volume of fluid is displaced in an extremely short period of time each time a valve closes. This pulse of momentum may be strong enough that it traveled through the tubes and into the settling column where it may create instabilities leading to vorticity.
  4. The tungsten lamp that generates the white light inside the turbidimeter radiates a significant amount of heat to the settling column. Some summer students had performed a heat test which concluded that the heat generated by the lamp did not affect the turbidimeter's ability to measure turbidity accurately; however, because the heat tests had been performed using mixtures containing very fine clay particles, the effects of density driven convection was not apparent in the turbidity readings. If the heat transfer between the lamp and water was large enough, the change in the local density of fluid would cause convection currents that could potentially create the type of circulation we have been observing.

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} VisualExperimentation">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Visual Experimentation

Unknown macro: {cloak}

Several visual experiments were conducted to determine what the actual cause of the reciruclation was from. First, we conducted experiments changing the pump control shutoff, then we experimented with the changing diameter of the elbow to the column, and lastly, we experimented with the heat factor.

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} PumpControlShutoff">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Pump Control Shutoff

Unknown macro: {cloak}

First, the pump control shutoff was removed from the beginning of the settle state to a new state before settle state. This allowed for the pumps to be shutoff seconds before the valves were shutoff. Different times between the two shutoff points were experimented with, but each time, at the time of the valve shutoff, a jerk in motion would seem to cause a recirculation in flow. Perhaps we need to not shutoff the valve in order to prevent this recirculation.

Monroe programmed a new variable in Process Controller to ramp down the pump controls to zero instead of abruptly switching from a high pump control value to zero (shutoff) automatically. We installed this ramp down function in Process Controller and tested it on our apparatus. The ramp down would bring the flow down to an easier flow. We tried this new function with both a downward flowing and upward flowing column to detect any differences.

After careful observation, it was concluded that the recirculation was occurring even without the valve shutoff (about 20-30 seconds into settling state) and it maybe from either the pump shutoff causing a "push/pull" in the water (even though the pump is being ramped down, there is still a slight pressure change when the pump is completely shutoff) or from the diameter change from the flocculator tube to the settling column causing eddies of turbulence in the top of the column.

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} ElbowConnections">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Elbow Connections

Unknown macro: {cloak}

Another possible source of recirculation in the settling column is the elbow connections. The settling column is bounded by both an elbow connection coming into the column and going out of the column. Not only do these connections cause a sharp turn in flow, but there is a diameter change between the elbow and the column. The change in diameter could be causing preferential flow in the column, therefore, a recirculation current.

In order to alleviate the possibility of recirculation due to the change in diameters, a bunch of plastic drinking straws were cut to 2.5 inches and placed in the upper portion of the settling column where the column attaches to the elbow connection. This, the team thought, would help to reduce the preferential flow pattern that could be caused by the change in diameter. After placing the straws into the settling column, we observed that the recirculation currents were reduced. It is important to note for the next experiment that the majority of these elbow experiments were conducted with the settling column outside the turbidimeter.

null null

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} HeatInducedCurrents">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Heat Induced Currents

Unknown macro: {cloak}

Next, it was hypothesized that the heat produced from the IR lightbulb in the turbidimeter may be causing the recirculation. Comparison experiments were conducted with the settling column outside the turbidimeter, where heat from the lamp would not be an issue, and inside the turbidimeter, where the heat could have an affect on the column. When the column was placed outside the turbidimeter, no recirculation was occurring. However, experiment conducted when the column was inside the turbidimeter, recirculation currents were clearly visible.

null null

In order to ensure that heat may be the determining factor, the team wanted to test whether another type of heat source would cause recirculation. The settling column was placed outside the turbidimeter but when the experiment came to the settling state, a team member wrapped their hand around one part of the column to provide a heat source. Once again, recirculation was visible and the team determined that heat was definitely the major contributing source to recirculation in the settling column.

Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak} Conclusions">
Unknown macro: {toggle-cloak}
Conclusions

Unknown macro: {cloak}

While the recirculation problem in the settling column was finally treated by removing the heat source from the column, the team believes that the problem could have been caused by several different sources and the culmination of all of these experiments probably helped in solving the recirculation currents.

To remove the heat source, the team is working with HF Scientific to replace the IR lamp with a non-heat producing LED lamp. Additionally, the team has replaced the elbow connections with straight connections. In order to be able to use these straight connections, the team needs to figure out a way to stop the flow traveling into the settling column after the settle state has begun, in order to prevent watching the settling of a long vertical tube besides just the sample in the settling column. By introducing a slanted tube with a simple trap before the tube inlet, the team has managed to collect settling flocs in the tube from the top of the board during no-flow state.

Also, the team will determine whether or not the straws are helping to reduce the recirculation problem even after the straight connections have been added and the heat source is removed, or if they are unnecessary.

  • No labels