Overview of Methods
In these experiments the alum dosage supplied to the flocculation system was varied in order to study how floc and floc blanket formation affect the effluent turbidity produced by the tube settler. The experimental set-up is identical to the one used in Spring 2009, and from our results we hope to analyze velocity gradient thresholds and possibly investigate how changing influent water chemistry affects the setter's efficiency.
Results and Discussion
Using the Spring 2009 team's process controller methods, we subjected an ideal geometry to non-ideal conditions. Though the Spring 2009 team had success with a 9.5 mm diameter tube, due to a change in influent water chemistry over the summer or the addition of a flow accumulator to the method, we experienced failure with this geometry. We achieved an acceptable effluent turbidity (less than 1 NTU) with a 15.1 mm diameter tube that had a length of 30.5 mm. With the ideal results, we then subjected this tube settler to varying alum dosage to investigate the dependency of the performance of the tube settler on this parameter. At each alum dosage, the tube settler was tested at a variety of capture velocities and at two different floc blanket levels.
Experiment 1: Alum Dose = 45 mg/L
Experiment 2: Alum Dose = 35 mg/L
Experiment 3: Alum Dose = 65 mg/L
Process Control Files
Conclusions
Figure 1: Capture Velocity vs. Average Effluent Turbidity shown for each alum dose (35, 45, 65 mg/L) for the Floc Blanket on low
Figure 2: Capture Velocity vs. Average Effluent Turbidity shown for each alum dose (35, 45, 65 mg/L) for the Floc Blanket on high
Floc Blanket Height |
Alum Dose (mg/L) |
5 m/day |
10 m/day |
15 m/day |
20 m/day |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low |
35 |
.3136 |
.1799 |
.2353 |
.3093 |
High |
35 |
.1457 |
.1535 |
1.278 |
.5889 |
Low |
45 |
.7667 |
.7374 |
.9094 |
.8192 |
High |
45 |
.5946 |
.6407 |
.8321 |
.5638 |
Low |
65 |
.2155 |
.4129 |
.6635 |
.5637 |
High |
65 |
.2446 |
.2414 |
.6634 |
.5637 |
The above table shows the average effluent turbidities for each alum dosage, floc blanket state and capture velocity.
Overall, the system performed well and most of the average effluent turbidities were below 1 NTU. The overdose of alum did cause the effluent turbidity to be slightly higher than the ideal dose, however it was still within the range of ideal effluent turbidity. It was expected that the 35 mg/L alum dose would perform poorly. However, this dosage produced better results than the ideal alum dose, so further experiments are being performed to collect data with a lower alum stock concentration.