Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The following table demonstrates how the results change with a greater number of cells. It is quite clear that the mesh created in the tutorial (which has around 350,000 cells) is not fine enough to obtain a sufficiently accurate solution. 

These results were obtained with the following mesh settings: 

Convergence of the numerical solution is represented by a negligible change in power coefficient from an approximately four-fold increase in number of elements in the mesh. The mesh was refined by adjusting local mesh controls: relevance center, face sizing, inflation and sphere of influence. To obtain a mesh of 7.7 million elements (right-most data point in the plot), the relevance center was set to fine; the face size was set to 0.05m; for inflation, the number of layers was increased to 10 at a growth rate of 1.2; for the sphere of influence, the radius was set to 50m and element size was set to 1m.

Check that domain is adequately large

Note

Running the blade model on a larger flow domain has not yet been done.

Note

Under Construction

Compare blade tip velocities

The blade tip velocity was found to be 98.05 m/s in CFD-Post. This is basically identical to result obtain from hand-calculations which was 98.10 m/s. Great!

...