Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3
Include Page
SIMULATION: Stepped Shaft T-Beam - PanelSIMULATION: Stepped Shaft
T-Beam - Panel
Include Page
SIMULATION: ANSYS Google AnalyticsSIMULATION:
ANSYS Google Analytics

...

Verification

...

& Validation

For the case where we constrain all nodes along the knife edge, we see that there is substantial disagreement between the three-dimensional FEA predictions and both the experimental results and those predicted by one-dimensional, Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.

Image Added

Reasons for this disagreement are discussed in the text in Example 4.1. Relatively substantial differences in stress can result from differences in strain that are orders of magnitude smaller. Such differences in strain can result from Poisson effects when all nodes are constrained through the thickness of the cross section. When out-of-plane curvature results as can result from said Poisson effects (see Figure 4.9 of the text), the constraint off all nodes along the knife edge may over-constrain the cross section. As a result, one can relax the simple support constraint in three-dimensions by constraining ONLY a subset of nodes along the knoef edge so as to allow this out-of-plane curvature to occur.

When this is done, the results seem more reasonable:

Image Added

As with the I-Beam Tutorial #2, loads and boundary conditions here were not originally placed along the neutral axis as prescribed by Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, yet the theory performs reasonably well when the end constraints are relaxed to allow for out-of-plane curvature as might be expected in this case. Further alternative considerations for relevant boundary conditions are considered in the Exercises.


Go

Widget Connector
width600
urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqKk62f_e9o
height370

Axial Stress Concentration Factor

In the table below, the axial stress concentration factors on the original and refined meshes are compared with the hand calculation from the Pre-Analysis step. Recall that the hand calculation used a formula from Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain.

ANSYS, Original mesh

ANSYS, Refined mesh

Hand calculation

1.309

1.316

1.377

There is only a slight change on refining the mesh. The stress concentration factor on either mesh is accurate to within the level of accuracy of the cited formula, i.e. 5%. This increases our confidence in the ANSYS results.

Continue to Exercises

Go to all ANSYS Learning Modules