Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Include Page

...

Plane Frame - Panel

...

Plane Frame - Panel

...

Include Page

...

titleUnder Construction

...

This Section is UNDER Construction!!!

ANSYS Google Analytics
ANSYS Google Analytics

...

Verification & Validation

...

It is imperative to do some checks to make sure that the numerical results are accurate. Numerical results can either be compared directly to empirical data or they may be compared to theory.

Mesh Refinement

Another, way to verify the solution of a numerical method is to examine the convergence of the solution as the mesh is refined. Generally, the numerical solution should converge to the exact solution as the mesh is refined. In order to refine the mesh, first expand the mesh tab, Image Removed, in the tree outline. Next, click on "Edge Sizing", Image Removed, such that it highlights blue. Now, change the number of divisions in the "Details of "Edge Sizing"" table. Remember, that each line segment of the plane frame structure will be divided in to the number of divisions that you specify. After you have changed the "Number of Divisions" to your preference, click on the solve button, Image Removed, to recalculate the solution with the new mesh.

The table below displays the outputs of the ANSYS simulation for a mesh of 2 elements and a mesh of 10 elements.

...

Total Deformation (m)

...

Maximum Bending Stress Pa

Note

Under Construction

 



Go to Exercises

Go to all ANSYS Learning Modules

...

Theory Values

...

0.005103

...

4.635x10^6

...

2 Element FEA

...

0.0051352

...

4.6352x10^6

...

10 Element FEA

...

0.0051352

...

4.6352x10^6

As one can see from the table above the results do not change as the mesh is refined. The reason that the results do not change is that they have already converged to the answer. The exact solution for the deformation is cubic and for this setup ANSYS uses element BEAM 188 which in turn uses cubic interpolation. Thus, for the simple cantilever beam setup the numerical method converges very quickly.