...
The floc terminal sedimentation velocity and the residual turbidity of flocculated suspension are important properties in a flocculator because all the particles having a terminal velocity lower than the capture velocity of the sedimentation tank are going to live the tank with the clear water causing the residual turbidity. (Rewrite this sentence. Make the distinction of what terminal sedimentation velocity represents. Put in the description you had in the other section here. With residual turbidity, you are measuring the anticipated performance you would have . Residual turbidity is the turbidity resulting from the flocs that failed to reach the capture velocity, which is approximately 0.12 mm/s for the plate settlers in AguaClara plants. Residual turbidity is a measurement of the anticipated performance of the plant if the effluent from the flocculator passed into the tube settlers without any other sedimentation process). The Spring 2009 team quantitatively evaluated quantitatively the effect of shear velocity on these parameters. To do so, they used the flocculation residual turbidity meter (FRETAFReTA) developed by the AguaClara team and a data processor to analyze these parameters automatically ( see data acquisition)
Our goal for these first experiments was to familiarize ourselves with the apparatus and the data processor (MathCAD file) made by the previous team (Spring 2009) and to try to replicate one of their last experiments to make sure that the apparatus and the MathCAD file were working properly.
...
Flocculator length | Flow rate | Influent Turbidity | Alum dose | Residence time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2796 cm | 3-19 mL/s | 100 NTU | 45 mg/L | 1196.13 s |
*Figure 1 *: _ Evolution of the velocity gradient with flow rate_
...
The figures 2,3,4,5 show the plots, given by the data processor, with the data from our experiment (9/24/09) and the data from the Spring 2009 experiment (5/13/09). Comparing graphs at each state, we observed similar results when compared with the previous years experiments. Our experimental values; , seen on the graphs below, are not exactly the same as Ian's Spring 2009 data because the experiments were not performed under the same conditions, but they closely resembled one another.
Figure 2, A and B, shows the normalized effluent turbidity vs. time during the settling state for Spring 2009 team's experiment and Fall 2009 team's experiment, respectively. In both cases, the turbidity of the water decreases rapidly. Moreover, we can observe that for low flow rates, the turbidity decreases more rapidly and the residual turbidity is lower in both experiments. Figure 3, A and B, represents the normalized turbidity as a function of Vs. As Vs is the inverse of time, we observe the opposite trend in the data. Figure 4, A and B, shows the cumulative distribution function and figure 5, A and B, show the resulting probability density function (PDF) of settling velocities obtained from the fitted gamma distribution for Fall 2009 experiment and Spring 2009 experiment. We can observe on the PDF curves that in both cases the mean velocities are decreasing with the flow rate (trace 1 being the lowest flow rate and trace 8 the highest).
...