Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Reflection Report 1
Section
bordersfalse
Column
width25%
Column

Stock Tank Mixing

Spring 2011

Overview

The Spring 2011 2014 Stock Tank Mixing Team is tasked with improving the current stock tank mixing system that is currently being implemented within AguaClara plants. We are currently running experiments with aluminum sulfate (alum), polyaluminum chloride (PACl), and water. The team's objectives include determining the range of acceptable concentrations the stock solution can be, analyzing and improving the efficiency of the existing mixing system, and designing a new mixing system for use on future plants. Thus far, we have conducted experiments testing different ranges of concentrations with alum, designed several types of mixing systems, and begun small scale testing one of the mixing system designs.

Column
width20%
Panel
bgColorgrey90
width150
titleMembers
borderStylesolid

Chris Inferrera
Jae Lim
Boyang Mao

Panel
bgColorgrey90
width150
titlePast Research
borderStylesolid

This is a new team with no past research.

Panel
bgColorgrey90
width150
titleMore Information
borderStylesolid

team redesigned the mixing process of stock solutions in AguaClara plants.

Excerpt

The primary goal of the Fall 2013 team was to design a centrifugal pump to mix stock solutions, with test designs utilizing a rotating arm that employed the pressure gradient due to rotation to bring dense solution located at the bottom of the tank to the top. End-of-semester tests showed high pump inefficiency due to large amounts of wasted input power due to drag on the rotating arm. The test results prompted entire mixing redesign by the Spring 2014 team.

Two main designs were fabricated and tested on the small scale: a shallow bucket with small holes in the bottom and a plate (each attached to a handle) that were pumped up and down in the stock tank. The bucket design was meant to physically bring dense solution located at the bottom of the tank to the top of the tank while the plate design created turbulence and jets to encourage mixing. Both designs achieved full mixing with the same number of pump cycles, but the plate design requires less time because when the plate reaches the surface height, it is immediately plunged back down to the bottom of the tank. The bucket design, meanwhile, requires waiting for the fluid to drain out before being plunged back to the bottom. Full-scale designs will be based on the plate mixer are will be restricted by stock tank dimensions.

Additionally, a water injection system was designed to deposit the necessary volume of water for the stock solution into the bottom of the tank. This process greatly reduced the amount of manual mixing required of the operator. Any required manual mixing is intended to be performed using the plate mixer described above.

Column
Gallery
includestock tanks resized.png,rotoplas.jpg,rotating pump sketch resized.png
columns1
Section
Column
Team Members

Apoorv Gupta
Alexandra Cheng

Column
Center

Documents
Column
Past Research


Attachments
patterns.*xmcd