Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

The head loss was be determined by performing an energy balance around the rotameter.

Wiki Markup
{float}{float}

Center
classmyclass
Figure 2: Measurement Diagram
Wiki Markup
{center:class=myclass}h5.Figure 2: Measurement Diagram{center}

From the energy equation head loss can be expressed as a function of the difference in the pressure, velocity, and height difference.

{}$$ h_L = {P_1 - P_2\over {pg}} + {V_1^2 - V_2^2\over {2g}} + {z_1 - z_2} $${latex}
Wiki Markup
Latex

Since flow is controlled by the peristalic pump, the flow is constant, and since the tube diameter is also constant, there would be no difference in the velocity.

{latex}$$ h_L = {P_1 - P_2\over {pg}} + 0 + {z_1 - z_2} $${}
Wiki Markup
Latex

If the pressure difference is measured when there is no flow, then the head loss and the velocity terms from the energy equation would be zero. This allows the height difference to be expressed as the pressure reading from the standing water.

...

{latex}$$ {P_{1standing} - P_{2standing}\over {pg}} = z_2 - z_1 $${}
Latex

The pressure reading from the standing water is subtracted from the measured pressure difference values to cancel out the height term. The resulting pressure difference corresponds directly to head loss of the rotameter.

...

As seen in Figures 2 and 3, the experimental data fit best to a 0.09 in orifice with a 2 cm offset in pressure. This 2 cm of extra head needed to fit the 0.09 in orifice model has been hypothesized to be caused by the energy needed to lift the ball float.

Center
classmyclass
Figure 2: Full Flow Experiment #1
Wiki Markup
{center:class=myclass}h5.Figure 2: Full Flow Experiment #1
(3/09/10):
8
-
380
mL/min
{center}


Center
classmyclass
Figure 3: Full Flow Experiment #2
Wiki Markup
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 3: Full Flow Experiment #2
(3/11/10):
8
-
380
mL/min
{center}


In Figures 2 and 3 there is also a seemingly linear response in the data at low flow rates. Another experiment was performed at 8 to 40 mL/min flow rates to determine if this was indeed linear.

Center
classmyclass
Figure 4: Low Flow Experiment #1
Wiki Markup
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 4: Low Flow Experiment #1
(3/11/10):
8
-
40
mL/min
{center}


Center
classmyclass
Figure 5: Low Flow Experiment #2
Wiki Markup
{center:class=myclass}h5. Figure 5: Low Flow Experiment #2
(3/12/10):
8
-
40
mL/min
{center}


From the data, it seems that there is a linear response at low flow rates until about 25-30 mL/min. (All data and results can be found on the attached file.

...