ANC CONTROL
FALL 2009 Research
INTRODUCTION
The former ANC group experimented on different designs for a lime feeder, including a column model, a conical vessel, a funnel-column and an inverted traffic cone model. These results can be found on pages 10 through 17 of ANC control with lime.docx and in Table 1 below. The descriptions and diagrams pertaining to the experimental set-ups are explained in pages 4 through 8 of the above report.
The Column model column succeeded in keeping the lime suspended for a few hours but the water began to flow in a preferential path after the lime settled on the bottom. For the conical column, the mixing at the bottom of the vessel proved to be insufficient in keeping all the lime in a suspended state. On the other hand, the funnel-column apparatus worked well for 20 hours but only because it was unclogged periodically, which would not possible in a real-time set up.
As a result, the inverted cone model that supplied saturated limewater at a pH between 11 and 12 for about 18 hours without having to be unclogged and without the above difficulties was selected as the best alternative among them.
The most effective design was the inverted cone because it . However, the main problem with it is was that inverted cones are extremely difficult and expensive to construct, install and maintain. So the task of the ANC team is was to search for a simpler solution for the lime feeder design. Since the upflow velocities were also highly variable (as seen in Table 1), another goal was to find the optimal upflow velocity for the limefeeder.
Wiki Markup |
---|
{float:left}*Table 1. Results of 2006 Experiments. M_init is the initial mass of lime; Q is the flow rate; T_obs is the time the effluent had a pH of 12; T is the theoretical duration; Vb is the upflow velocity; and Vbottom is the velocity at the bottom of the vessel.{float} |
Reactor | M_init (g) | Q (L/min) | Res.Time | T_obs (hr) | T(hr) | Vb | Vbottom |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HalfCone | 400 | 0.6 | 12.48 | 9 | 12.56 |
| 84.9 |
Funnel | 200 | 0.1 | 46.10 | 20 | 37.67 | 0.71 | 12.4 |
Funnel | 200 | 0.1 | 46.10 | 25 | 37.67 | 0.71 | 12.4 |
Funnel | 100 | 0.1 | 46.10 | 7.75 | 18.84 |
| 12.4 |
Cone | 300 | 0.4 | 31.95 | 6 | 10.69 | 1.5 | 19.6 |
Cone | 300 | 1 | 12.78 | 1.25 | 4.28 |
| 49.0 |
Cone | 500 | 0.88 | 14.52 | 4.75 | 8.10 | 2.35 | 43.1 |
Cone | 1800 | 0.55 | 23.24 | 18 | 46.65 |
| 26.9 |
Cone | 1000 | 0.52/0.84 | 22.02 | 11 |
|
|
|
Cone | 1000 | 0.67 | 20.00 | 12 |
| 1.65 | 32.8 |
ALKALINITY IN HONDURAN WATER
The table below shows the actual measures measurements of pH and alkalinity in AguaClara treatment plants in Honduras. To have high accuracy in the lime feeder design, the team will simulate the conditions of raw water more accurately research ANC, the conditions of Honduran raw water were simulated in the laboratory. The results in the table demonstrate a decrease of pH during the treatment process which . It is strongly visible on Cuatro Comunidades and Tamara plants.
Source: Honduras water reports, 2009
. Therefore, one goal was to increase the alkalinity of the water, creating a buffer system against acidity.
Wiki Markup |
---|
{float:left}*Table 2: Water Quality in Honduras
Source: Honduras water reports, 2009{float} |
OJOJONA | RAW WATER | TREATED WATER |
---|---|---|
pH (UN) | 6.51 - 6.8 | 6.26 - 6.56 |
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3) | 34.7 - 36.3 | 17.3 - 19.4 |
MARCALA | RAW WATER | TREATED WATER |
pH (UN) | 6.44 - 7.28 | 6.07 - 6.45 |
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3) | 15.3 | Before chlorination 8.7 |
CUATRO COMUNIDADES | RAW WATER | TREATED WATER |
pH (UN) | 6.34 - 7.00 | 6.80 - 6.85 |
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3) | 7.65 | Before chlorination 4.59 |
TAMARA | RAW WATER | TREATED WATER |
pH (UN) | La Chorrera: 6.44 | 6.56 - 6.66 |
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3 | La Chorrera: 7.14 | 4.08 |
PROPERTIES OF LIME
The pH of calcium hydroxide(lime) solution decreases with an increase in temperature. (see Figure 3 below) The temperature at the Honduran plants is generally in the range of 19-21 degrees C but during summers it can increase to 27 degrees C. This temperature differential can change the pH of limewater and thereby affect the working of the lime feeder and needs to be taken into consideration while designing the lime feeder.
Figure 3. Changes in pH of lime with respect to Temperature changes
Wiki Markup |
---|
{float}{float} |
PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
One of the first tasks was to calculate the dosage of lime required by the lime feeder and the measure the relationship between the changes in pH and ANC with changing flow rates in the lime feeder. The
analysis of lime feeder flow requirements was made with the help of MathCAD software.
At this stage, the team also continued to search for other information including the cost of distilled water, lime properties (solubility with temperature), and Honduras' water regulation.
...
FUTURE TASKS
- Run several trials with the new design to determine the amount of lime required to maintain a pH of 12 for 24 hours. In addition the performance of the new design will be evaluated and revised, if necessary.
- Simulate Honduran water conditions. Once the lime feeder design is working successfully with distilled water, a new experiment will be required to analyze the performance with a lower pH concentration.
- Recalculate design dimensions while taking into account the natural variation of flow rate at the inlet tank in the water treatment plant.
The next tasks were a series of experiments carried on the column-based model of a lime feeder.
Experiment 1: Feasibility of using a Glass column as a fluidized Lime feeder
Experiment 2: Testing the lime feeder performance using a pH probe
Experiment 3: Addition of sloping glass column above the lime feeder and Tube-length Calculations