...
- Currently the drill size is based on the diameter that is the best fit for the top hole, it would be interseting to see what the effect is on the error if different rows were used to determine the diameter. The very top hole has a relatively small flow rate based on other rows - there may be a critical row.
- Also the point of failure experiment was conducted and the results were contrary to the expected hypothesis. Instead of the LFOM working to a certain flow rate and then failing the flow rates were linear but with a differnt different slope than the predicted values, information is available on the results pagethe experiment page. The perplexing results may be due to the fact that there we were not witnessing a point of failure, a flow rate at which a LFOM will fail, but a complete failure. If the pipe is sized too small to accomodate the flow rate which the orifice pattern is designed to support then the LFOM will fail for all flow rates. This hypothesis would agree with the results. It would be useful to figure out what drives the effect witnessed with reduced diameter pipingbeneficial in future research to test the LFOM created above with a diameter of 1.5 inches with an orifice pattern designed to handle the maximum flow rate for the pipe, 62.5 L/min. It would also be interesting to apply a flow rate in excess of the 62.5 L/min and watch the system for evidence of failure.
- Thirdly it is important to work on interface between the LFOM and the automated chemical doser.