Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
 ITEMMENTIONSTIMEFRAMECOMMENTS
AConsolidate platforms / Samvera decision / exit bepress / migrate legacy collections / sunset systems111, 3 
BService management / role clarity / appropriate staffing level781, 3See also I, below
CComplete and public-facing policies, contact information51, 3Some suggest consistency across repositories. One specific mention of consistent collection policies. See also I, below
DDevelop/define CUL-wide repository strategy; clear purpose for each repo; clarify place of repositories in CUL priorities51, 3Don't base on CU/CUL org structure
EEnsure preservation of repository content341, 3 
FParticipate in selected open sources communities23Presumes some consolidation of platforms
GImprove discovery (and interoperability to support it)23 
HEvaluate / explore existing and potential external partnerships and shared repos (e.g. BHL, Internet Archive, other)21, 3 
IAdopt / implement repository principles document across CUL21See also B, C above

...

  • RepoExec should meet less frequently
  • Support for large (>3GB) datasets in eCommons (i.e. Globus)
  • Greater transparency on part of RepoExec, especially for liaisons
  • Complete documentation for all repositories
  • Define "metadata of record," in particular to support movement of content from one repo to another
  • Clarify repository landscape (support staff understanding of it)
  • Clarify whether collection and deposit of Cornell faculty papers is a priority (and if it is, staff appropriately)
  • Better communication among repository staff to share ideas, challenges, goals, etc.
  • PR / marketing support for repositories to improve visibility
  • Improve or modernize feature set in repositories; better support for customization
  • If supporting OJS, need to provision for service. Possible CUL-CUP partnership? Possible consolidation of existing pubs?

 

PRIORITIZING

  • Day to day work experience / pain points
  • Previous RepoExec discussions
  • Issues of technical debt, need to consolidate platforms
  • 1-year: things that can be done with current knowledge and resources
  • Funders' public access requirements (for data)
  • Lifecycle and longer-term thinking
  • Desire to break down siloes

...