Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The most striking difference between the two results is the thickness of the shock. Notice that for the refined mesh, the shock is less thick that for the original mesh. This shows that the refined mesh is converging towards the real case.

Separated Shock

Next, we will alter the geometry to achieve a separated shock. Close FLUENT and open the Design Modeler. We want to increase the angle of the wedge above its critical angle. We will increase the angle to 35 degrees. Change the geometry's dimensions to match that of the diagram below.

Image Removed

Once the geometry has changed, close the design modeler. We will have to re-calculate the solution, but we will want to change some factors affecting the solution. Usually, when you make an upstream change in ANSYS, the program will update all of the downstream data. We want to break this connection, so right click Image Removed and select
Reset. We will have to input the boundary conditions again, but that shouldn't take long – and will end up saving us time when we calculate the solution inside of the FLUENT environment.

Next, open up the mesher by double clicking Image Removed. Update the mesh by clicking Image Removed. Close the mesher, click Image Removed, then once again double click Image Removed. Re-enter all of the data from Step 5 (here is link for reference). This time, set the Courant Number to 1.0. This will make the solution a little more unstable, but it will solve much, much faster. Run the solution again, this time with 5000 iterations.

Image Removed

Plot the contour plot of the mach number to see how the shock has changed.

Image Removed