Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Process Control Files

Conclusions



Figure 1: Capture Velocity vs. Average Effluent Turbidity shown for each alum dose (35, 45, 65 mg/L) for the Floc Blanket on low at low floc blanket level.


Figure 2: Capture Velocity vs. Average Effluent Turbidity shown for each alum dose (35, 45, 65 mg/L) for the Floc Blanket on high dosage at high floc blanket level.

Floc Blanket Height

Alum Dose (mg/L)

5 m/day

10 m/day

15 m/day

20 m/day

Low

35

.3136

.1799

.2353

.3093

High

35

.1457

.1535

1.278

.5889

Low

45

.7667

.7374

.9094

.8192

High

45

.5946

.6407

.8321

.5638

Low

65

.2155

.4129

.6635

.5637

High

65

.2446

.2414

.6634

.5637

The above table shows the average effluent turbidities for each alum dosage, floc blanket state and capture velocity.

Overall, the system performed well and most of the average effluent turbidities were below 1 NTU. The overdose of alum did cause the effluent turbidity to be slightly higher than the ideal dose, however it was still within the range of ideal effluent turbidity. It was expected that the 35 mg/L alum dose would perform poorly. However, this dosage produced better results than the ideal alum dose, so further experiments are being performed to collect data with a lower alum stock concentration.