Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Using the Spring 2009 team's methods, we subjected an ideal geometry to non-ideal conditions. Though the Spring 2009 team had success with a 9.5 mm diameter tube, due to a change in chemistry in the influent water during the summer or the addition of a flow accumulator to the method, we experienced failure with this geometry. We achieved an acceptable effluent turbidity (less than 1 NTU) with a 15.1 mm diameter tube. With these results, we then subjected this tube settler to varying alum dosage to investigate the dependency of the performance of the tube settler on the alum dosage. At each alum dosage, the tube settler was tested at a variety of capture velocities and at two different floc blanket levels.

Experiment 1: Alum Dose = 45 mg/L

Experiment 2: Alum Dose = 35 mg/L

...