Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. The optimal h/b were shown to be 3~5.
  2. Symmetry boundary condition cases had difficulty in converging to e-5, and e-4 in some cases.
  3. The results change little from e-5 to e-6.

...

Summary of completed tests

...

Image Removed

The series of geometries and meshes were created using the journal file, by varying the flocculator height. The boundary conditions and all the other FLUENT settings can be found in the report summaries: symmetry top boundary condition and wall top boundary condition


Results and Discussions

Click here for the results of the preliminary simulations2 series of cases, completely summarized in an Excel workbook. Only parts of the graphical results are given below.
Shown below are contours of energy dissipation rate for h/b of 5 and 10, with symmetry boundary condition at the water air interface and one case with no slip(i.e. wall) boundary conditions.
Image Removedthe last two worksheet of the Excel workbook.

As shown in the Excel workbook of graphical and quantitative results, the energy dissipation pattern is very sensitive to convergence level. One order of magnitude difference in residual results in completely different shapes of energy dissipation region at the top of flocculator. It is also noted that using symmetric boundary condition at the water-air interface at top of the flocculator makes it more difficult to converge to lower residual levels. The original purpose of using symmetric boundary condition is to mimic the frictionless condition at the water-air interface, but the energy dissipation contour of h/b=20 may also suggest whether using wall or symmetry boundary condition at water-air interface may not make a significant difference, and both cases could produce similar results at a better convergence level, which is consistent with our physical intuitions.contour of energy dissipation rate changed little judging from eyeball examination, but the calculated performance parameters still showed some variability as the convergence level changes.

And the iteration steps need for each cases at the three different levels:

Image Added

Conclusions

  • Energy dissipation rate contour and quantitative analysis show dependence of performance parameters as a function of h/b ratio, which suggest it worth further investigation.
  • Results are very sensitive to convergence levels.
  • Symmetric boundary condition makes it difficult to converge.
  • Symmetric boundary condition and wall boundary condition may have similar results at good convergence levels (residual below e-6). We can use wall boundary condition to replace symmetry boundary condition to ensure accuracy of the results.

...