Attendees:

  • Debra Howell
  • Laura Daniels
  • Ann Crowley
  • Vandana Shah
  • Emily Zinger
  • Andy Horbal
  • Jesse Koennecke
  • Simeon Warner
  • Jacob Sayward
  • Tom Trutt

Regrets:

  • Phil Robinson - presenting on Bursar Integration at the Explore Session

Agenda:

  • Review enhancement requests (1)
  • Security Team Updates - Phil
  • Support Team Updates - Tom
    • Upgrade hiccups
  • Anything from CC/PC/TC - Simeon/Jesse/Phil
    • CC: nothing exciting; focusing on getting new memberships for next year
    • PC: FOLIO roadmap; prioritization of JIRAs process; 
    • TC: Phil will do a one year term ending in July due to CUL-IT restructuring
  • Explore Session: Harry Kaplanian Roadmap Recap:
    • Discussion of most frustrating gaps in FOLIO
    • Discussion of creating principles
      • Laura's example: Fix what's broken before creating something new
  • CONTINUED: Themes and Discuss how we might maintain this going forward: Continue conversation on "How do we understand and agree on CUL priorities for FOLIO?"
  • Open discussion time

FYI

  • Kiwi upgrade complete
  • Hot Fix 2 applied 3/17
  • Patron Feed:
    • PeopleSoft will be down from March 3-6 for move from IBM to AWS
    • Notify CU-LIB with scenarios of "how this impacts you"
  • BorrowDirect lending has been turned on
  • ArchiveSpace integration: transitioned to Brandon for completion; hopefully before 3/31 when Erin departs


Tracking

  • UPDATE - Andy
    • At Monday's RA SIG meeting Stephanie Buck gave an update on Title-Level Requesting (TLR) and noted that institutions that wanted to implement it will likely be able to do so as early as Morning Glory. More details can be found on the FOLIO wiki here: https://wiki.folio.org/display/RA/Title+level+requests+-+features+and+info. Would CUL want to implement Title-Level Requesting - how do we make the decision as it spans functional areas? It definitely would impact both access services and LTS workflows, and might affect other areas as well, such as CUL-IT via Blacklight. - Andy
      • 1 use case that we can think of: Long term loan laptops where the patron wants the next one that's available
      • Could have potential for reserves stuff
    • Next step: Andy will work with Access Services and Public Services to see if we want this and report back
      • Andy talked with Bonna and her recommendation is to ask the ASST to consult with other groups and come up with a recommendation for CUL
    • Andy's notes on prioritization:
      • Of these five issues, the one on line 35 of the “Cornell Current Priorities” spreadsheet you created (“Wrong slips are being inserted . . . ”) is our #1 top priority, and we humbly submit that it should be pretty high up on CUL’s list as well.
      • We think that the ones on lines 32 (“Part of the extended time . . . “), 33 (“The ‘print by default’ settings . . .”), and 34 (“Showing the print preview . . . “) would ideally be grouped as a single priority called something like “improve printing,” and it’s also pretty important to us. If we HAVE to treat them separately, the one on line 34 is the biggest problem, but it might also be the toughest one to solve.
      • The one on line 31 (“Pick slips need to include . . . “) has gotten quite a bit of attention on JIRA lately and appears to be headed to the RA SIG for further discussion. We will continue to advocate for this in the FOLIO community, but don’t necessarily think it needs to be super high up on CUL’s list of priorities.
  • No labels