Ninite helps us patch 3rd party applications. Complements CM's Windows and MS Office patching.



Table of contents

Download Chemistry IT's Ninite installer (private page)

See also

Ninite's web site:

They have a page explaining what you get with the paid "Pro" version, and another page listing the software they cover:

Once you log in with a Pro account credentials, you access their easy-to-use and understand console.

  • With the console, one can install, uninstall, reinstall apps across all machines or individual machines.
  • Actions work for off-campus machines which CM can’t support.

How to pronounce Ninite:

Preface

Both CM and Ninite can patch select applications which already exist on a computer, however they got installed. The table below lists some ways they differ operationally.

  • By "CM", we are also meaning the use of WSUS in CM to pull in packaged updates coming from Flexera for systems put into "managed systems" groups.

Pricing

  • ~$720/yr for 100. ~$1,300/yr for 200 systems.
  • 3/29/2018: Our Technical Risk Assessment (TRA) for Ninite Pro was approved by Tom Horton, ITSO (required by Cornell Purchasing).

 

CriteriaNiniteCMNotes
Number of apps patched, if already exist on system

Many, many apps patched.

Including 100% of the ones CM currently patches.

Firefox, Flash, iTunes, Java, and Chrome patched. Others? See right =>Where does Cornell document CM's currently patched 3rd party apps? Process to add? All packaged by Flexera?
Capacity to install or uninstall a covered appSee above: Many app. Trivial to do per-machine, ad hoc adds and removes via web interface. It's actually fun!See above: Limited number. Not easy to add or remove in an ad hoc manner, much less per machine. 
Timely availabilityImmediately available, and we control directlySometimes protracted delayed availability. And then staged deployed over 1.5 weeks via first a test group, and then on to all "managed" systems.What gates initial availability from CIT's Managed Desktop (MD) group? (Why would there be much of a Cornell-side availability delay, especially as compared to Ninite?
Visibility of outcomes, and ease of ad hoc review
Clear, fast web-based view by authorized IT staff.

CM has report capabilities so if crafted to meet needs, swell. Less so for ad hoc  query interests.

Flexera reporting back is NOT visible to TSPs, right?

What value might Flexera's reports have to us TSPs managing systems?
Infrastructure requirementsNoneAD and CM. AND must be in a group accepting all Windows/ Office updates.RESEARCH-specific: For sensitive or research machines, CIT's updates and methods are often not appropriate.
ReliabilityPending. Presumed good.

Data points: Firefox will often install 32-bit version on systems with a 64-bit installed(?!).

Firefox will sometimes "update" to an OLDER version(?!).

 
Use of campusYesNoIf off campus AND use VPN, then CM may work.
Use on campus 10-space areasPending. Updating works if use proxy storage (have not yet tried this). And initial call-in of a client must be on full-space to tie client to our collection. (Subsequent communications through proxy storage?) ITSO added all-but-one of the Ninite-related domains and we must now confirm sufficient.Yes.RESEARCH-specific concern.

Data point

From: Michael E Hint
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 4:35 PM
Subject: Ninite Pro success - Firefox ESR 52.7.3

Thought I’d pass along that Firefox ESR 52.7.3 was released today. I was able to push it to 30 or so machines immediately in seconds, and the rest should get it when people close out of Firefox. A Ninite Pro success story.

Michael

One example in which Ninite performs better then CSI (Cornell is using within CM), for our needs

Q: Chemistry IT has been trying to move our users from Firefox 32-bit to 64-bit. As part of this transition, we uninstall 32-bit, but it appears these machines are getting patched by CM and 32-bit gets reinstalled. Is there anything we can do to stop this?

A: Keene Silfer, Desktop Engineering.
Incident INC000002216166
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Subject: Re: Incident INC000002216166, 'A&S Chemistry - Firefox CM patching
[...]
Check to see if there's a copy of the 32-bit Firefox .EXE file somewhere on the computer's hard drive (maybe in the Windows.old folder).
 
Since the CSI patches are path-based, if the CSI client detects that .EXE file somewhere on the hard drive, and that path gets added to the applicability metadata of the patch, it will end up "reinstalling" 32-bit Firefox as it attempts to patch that not-really-installed Firefox.

  • No labels