This page contains models to compare Cornell Shared File Service (SFS) with various AWS Storage options. Remember to consider more than just financial costs when picking a storage option. Consider access times when comparing SFS versus AWS storage; access to SFS from on-campus locations will almost always be faster than accessing AWS from on campus. SFS also presents storage as CIFS or NFS shares for direct mounting to VMs.
Model A - Static and Dynamic Archives
- Models total costs for active (dynamic) and inactive (static) storage options.
- Current version
- Cornell-SFS-vs-AWS-Storage.2016-12-06.xlsx
- Adjusted rate unit for SFS to be 1000GB
- Cornell-SFS-vs-AWS-Storage.2016-12-06.xlsx
- Previous versions
- Please contact pea1@cornell.edu if you find errors or improve the model.