JSMIN / Working Group Leads meeting, Oct. 21, 2014
Attending: Gary Branch, Adam Chandler, Sarah Elman, Kate Harcourt, Irina Kandarasheva, Jesse Koennecke, Jason Kovari, Jim LeBlanc, Lisa Maybury, Joyce McDonough, Dave Motson, Alan Schaplowsky, Barb Tarbox, Deb Warfield, Mark Wilson
We reflected on how we're doing four months into the newly conceived TSI, in particular with regard to the revised aim of Phase 2 to pursue only those collaborative projects and alliances that seem most promising and useful. There seems to be a consensus that apart from those opportunities that are dependent on a shared LMS, the TSI process in several functional areas has started to feel "natural" and "organic." It sometimes "seems like we've been colleagues forever." This interpersonal climate will serve us well if and when we implement an LMS together. And without the mandate to integrate, TSI now seems less forced.
We now have ready-made sounding boards for sharing information and ideas and for solving problems of mutual interest, which in turn creates potential opportunities for further collaboration. Bob Wolven's request that the E-Resources Team investigate slow response time for accessing Serials Solutions titles at Columbia is a good example of this kind of opportunity. This investigation is still ongoing (it's a mysterious problem), but has led to the development of joint WebEx video practices for demonstrating real-time performance of systems to the vendors of those systems.
The Non-MARC Metadata Team finds the model of TSI as initiative a "more natural fit" than integration. The Cataloging Team is engaged in several projects, perhaps most notably a leadership role (as 2CUL) in organizing multi-institutional Zepheira training for the BIBFRAME initiative. The Batch Processing Team continues to share information in biweekly phone calls. Alan and Deb are about to begin work with Kate and Jim on a print serials workflow study at both institutions.
Lois Purcell has begun work on a tabular inventory of procedures for use by both institutions, in consultation with Irina. We talked some about the proliferation of documentation methods: Columbia Confluence, Cornell Confluence, Google Docs, etc.
...