Specifications, costs, and trade-offs for upgrading and expanding the Matrix cluster.
From Scheraga, with Czarek, from 5/27/2014.
The bottom line IN THE FOLOWING BRIEF FORM is
A. Buy new head node
B. Buy new storage machine
C. Buy new computational nodes
C. Arrange an efficient back-up plan
Component |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Comments |
---|---|---|---|
A. New head node |
Dedicated chassis, 1 U |
One of four (a Quad), in one chassis. |
Consider Option 2 for cost savings (if any). |
B. New storage machine |
Synology-branded dedicated storage array. |
Home-brewed dedicated storage array, perhaps running OpenNAS software. |
Consider Option 2 for cost savings (if any). |
C. New computational nodes |
8 nodes, with higher computational processors. |
16 nodes, with standard computational processors. |
Consider Option 2 for doubling the number of compute nodes, even if each has slightly slower set of processors. |
D. Arrange an efficient back-up plan |
EZ-Backup |
(At current quantities of backed-up data, ChemIT cannot recommend an alternative.) |
On-going to do: Evaluate cost-effectiveness as volume grows. At current TB's of backup, costs are as were predicted (no surprises), and thus were at the time considered to be affordable and cost-effective compared to investing in own hardware and staffing. |