Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Potential areas for future work

The forum suggested a number of directions for future work which are summarized below.  Some of them will be investigated during the course of the IMLS project, while others may be taken up in other venues as appropriate. 

Project outputs

  • Draft of white paper that will serve as a public discussion document, and outlining key issues and recommendations for joint action

  • Survey relevant communities on local authority creation

  • Compile actual or model workflows. Identify stakeholders and roles, including service providers

    • Share information on how Harvard is resolving issues with their local authorities, and model an identity management workflow

    • ISNI workflows and use cases (see Gatenby and MacEwan slides)

    • Workflows from BIBFLOW project

    • Identify patterns for sharing data

  • Further analysis of  roles of stakeholders, e.g. publishers, service providers, libraries, academic institutions, scholars

  • Outline of how ISNI and VIAF relate to local authority needs

...

  •  Explore opportunities to work with publishers to acquire IDs with their data
  • Bring issues concerning identities to the FOLIO project’s UX team; encourage collaboration with community partners

  • Document Seek use cases and requirements for reconciliation as a service (already initiated by Peter Murray in FOLIO forum)

  • Propose ways to share information on matching algorithms

    • Sustainability is a consideration

  • Utah IMLS-funded regional authority control project

    • Consider how such a service may or may not interact with a larger hub such as ISNI.

  • Initiate discussion on lowering the barriers to NACO participation

  • Ways of sharing “how to” information

...