...
TOTAL for Option 1 column: <$50,750 + $1,000/yr for backupbackups.
Component | Option 1 (most likely)
| Option 2
| To consider, to do's, questions, notes and comments.
|
|---|
A. New head node | Dedicated chassis.
(1 U)
$3,000
| None.
| We considered using one of four computers (within a Quad), in one chassis (2U), for the head node. This is only worth considering if needing to save $5,000 by giving up one (of 8) compute node.
Note 1: Head node has lower proc, lower memory, and 256 GB SSD drive (for OS and applications).
Note 2: Head node price includes a large drive 4TB "WD black" for temp. user data (~$2,700+$250). |
B. New storage machine | Synology-branded dedicated storage array (RS 3412XS)
$3,000, plus five 4TB hard drives ($250ea). Total price is for 12-16TB initial storage, depending on risk choices (see Notes, at left).
$4,250
| Home-brewed dedicated storage array, perhaps running OpenNAS software.
To do: Get price of appropriate hardware.
| Consider Option 2 for cost savings (if any).
BUT, must also consider risk, support, and staffing effort.
To do: What connector? If ethernet: iSCSI (all compute node writes through head node) or NFS (theoretically could be accessible by compute nodes)? If not ethernet, what connector technology, at what price and complexity?
Note 1: Five 4TB HD's can allow for 1 drive to fail (16TB) or 2 drives to fail (12TB).
Note 2: Price for Option 1 includes five large 4TB "WD red?" for temp. user data (~$2,700+$250).
Note 3: $1,000 get you a redundant power supply.
|
C. New computational node
| 8 nodes (in 2 Quads), with higher computational processors.
Each node: 2 * E5-26700v2; 2.5GHz, 10 cores/ proc (thus, 20 cores/ node). Add $2,500 per node compared to Option 2. Thus, $5,100 each node.
$40,800
| 16 nodes (in 4 Quads), with standard computational processors.
Each node: 2 * E5-26200v2; 2.1GHz, 6 cores/ proc (thus, 12 cores/ node). $2,600 per node.
$41,600
| Consider Option 2 for increasing number of cores from 160 to 192, but with slower set of processors. See Czarek's note, from 4/14, below.
For either choice, to do: Storage: Fast or large? Or both?
Note: Buying in multiples of 4 (Quads) is most cost-effective.
|
D. Arrange an efficient back-up plan | EZ-Backup
$1,000 per year, at current amounts (2.7TB) and current rates (see Notes, at left).
| N/A.
At current quantities of backed-up data, ChemIT cannot recommend an alternative.
| On-going to do: Evaluate cost-effectiveness as volume grows.
Note 1: At current 2.7 TB's of backup (including compression and versioning), costs are as were predicted (no surprises). That is to say, were considered affordable and cost-effective compared to investing in own hardware and staffing.
Note 2: Costs are ~$80/ month currently for 2.7TB. Future amounts expected to be more.
Note 3: Rates likely >10% drop July 1, 2014, as in past years. |
E. Components for networking, power. And new rack.
| Under $2,700.
| N/A.
Not much discretionary elements in this category.
| Specifics:
Networking (~$1,500)
1 switch (Cisco SG300-52; ~$750)
Network cabling (price dependent on above decisions. Expect well under $1K)
Power (~$700)
UPS (APC SMC1500-2U; $500; for head node, storage node, and switch; Use current (cheaper) UPS, when again available from current head node, if necessary to spread load or for manageability.)
2-3 PDUs (power distribution units; a.k.a. power strips; $100 each)
Exact qty depends on processor decisions (amperage calculations)
Rack (~$500) |
...
