...
Micci Bogard, Greg Bronson, Greg Busby, RJ Davies, Jean Gustafson, Graham Hall, Stephanie Herrick (co-Facilitator), Butch Labrecque (co-Facilitator), Ned LaCelle, Benoit McNicoll, Greg Menzenski, Christine O'Brien, Ron Parks, Nathan Reimer, Andy Slusar, Casper Vanwyk
ADMINISTRIVIA:
...
- IS Activity Code - 1853: Lessons Learned Working Group
...
- Confluence Site - https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/LLWG/Home
...
...
- LLWG Session 3 – TBA
Agenda:
...
- Review Agenda
...
- Purpose of the Meeting & Tie back to Session 1
...
- "Report Back" presentations (15 min each) & Group Feedback (10 min each)
...
- Closing
PURPOSE OF MEETING:
Share & discuss working groups' results (potential solutions to top LL problems) and present strategies for implementing the solution(s) to the group in order to create and improve LL practices & tools
...
Two new expectations were added to the list: *
- Share LL's to take back to other PM's/projects
...
- Move LL's from project to project in order to start each project "slightly higher"
We reviewed the Expectations expressed in Session 1 and identified themes between these and the newly expressed Expectations: LearningLearning, Applying, Benefits, Common (repository), Best (practices), Capturing, Future (projects). *
- Get the "Cornell view" on LLs
...
- Learn from others, apply to other projects
...
- "we talk about it", but how do we make sure that others benefit from it?
...
- Learn common/"best" way to do LLs
...
- Discover if LLs can be "generalized"
...
- Put best practices in place & perhaps develop a common repository
...
- We don't currently have a way to capture LLs (repeatable process)
...
- How can we work LLs into best practices
...
- Find out if there is a way for the PM to find "balance" conducting & participating in LLs as well as to apply LLs to future projects
...
- Learn and hear others' experiences
...
- Observe & learn how to conduct LL sessions
...
- Can we combine LLs with something else to make it more valuable/practical?
...
- Support problem ID & LL action items/next steps in order to benefit future PMs/projects
...
- How to capture LLs, collaborate w/ the info & be more proactive with (acting on)
...
- LLs
We also reviewed Session 1 evaluation feedback: some positive feedback – thank you! – and some suggestions for improvement (more time, more time for intro's, team building activity was unnecessary, needed coffee).
We discussed how many of the Expectations expressed in Session 1 would be addressed (to some degree) in Session 2 and that we tried to work in folk's evaluation feedback from Session 1 into Session 2's agenda. Evaluations will be handed out at each session. Looking ahead to Session 3, we will make every effort to incorporate participant's feedback.
Report back & group feedback
Each team was asked to present their working group results with the larger group and allow time to collect feedback. The report-back format was as follows:
1 1. Introduce work group team members for the benefit of new LLWG participants
2 2. Provide clear definition of problem(s) addressed by the work group
3 3. Present the proposed solution(s)
4 4. Suggest strategies for implementing the solution(s)
5 5. Recommend next steps (action plan)
...
- <ask each team to record theirs>
CLOSING/NEXT STEPS
...
- We recapped progress to date and illustrated how the LLWG teams and deliverables are naturally interdependent:
...
- Teams were asked to meet to incorporate feedback received from the larger group into their solutions
...
- Steph & Butch will post meeting notes to Confluence, plan Session 3 (agenda TBA)
...
- Post-meeting evaluation
...
SESSION 2 LESSON LEARNED: formally facilitated, non-projectized working groups are very powerful!