Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

CriteriaCurrent deskop's specs~4 * TIMES the desktop specs is minumum proposed serverCost increase if go up about a level or soBorrowed Dell's specsNotes

Cores,

hyper-threading (HT)

4 cores (one processor)

No HT

i5-6500, 3.20 GHz

Total 16 cores (Two, 8-cores each)

HT-capable

Each: Xeon Silver 4110

+$460: 16 total cores => 20 total cores

+$1,200: 16 total cores => 24 total cores

Why not just one core?

  • +$5,080: 16 total cores => 24 total cores (one proc)

Why not four processors?

  • Only older processors are an option.
  • Server price STARTS at about $11,000, for 32

    total cores

    .

    See chart below for even options with more cores, focusing on slowest (thus cheaper) speeds.

    Also, see section below chart for why we are pricing two-processor server options instead of  single- or four-processor servers.

    16 cores (Two, 8 cores each)

    HT-capable

    Each: The now-older processor, Xeon E5-2620v4

    Q: Testing performance difference between using HT and not using HT?

    Storage

    , all SSD

    All SSD, unless otherwise noted

    500 GB

    2 TB

    $1,499 2.0TB SSD

    2TB is 4 times the space:

    2.0TB Samsung 960 PRO M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive (cost is $1,100)

    This is the fastest option since combines OS and data on fast bus. However, this may be the maximum TBs of storage doing it this way. (Can dig deeper, if necessary to decision-making.)

    If need more than 2TB total, must use more complicated multiple storage option. Example:

    OS only: 512GB Samsung 960 PRO M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive

    (cost is $399).

    AND choose a single main storage drive. For example:

    Data ONLY fast SSD:

    • 3.84TB => $1,500 - 2,000
    • 7.68TB => $3,000

    Data ONLY slow spinning, compared to current desktop:

    • 4TB => $200
    • 8TB => $350
    • 12TB => $650

    +$800: 2 TB => 3TB

    +$1,700: 2TB = 3.8 TB
    SSD (size n/a, at 400GB)

    If Windows, buy $xx software on server (free clients) to enable moving large amounts of data to server more speedily.

    Large amounts of data not needed to be stored on server, nor moved from server (simply deleted after processing).

    RAM32 GB128 GB$xx: 128 GB => 256 GB?32 GB 
    Other 

    Required: UPS ($xxx) (What capacity?)

    Option: Redundant power supply unit +$224)

    n/a  
    Total cost, approx. 

    ~$1,000?

    (*4 => $4,000)

    ~$5,500Approx. cost~$900?~$4,801n/a$xxx 

    Core prices snap-shot

    ...

    Approximate price increase buying TWO processors compared to 8-core Xeon Silver 4110

    NOTE: Can also get a server with just ONE processor (at half the marginal cost), if core-count is sufficient.

    Processor

    (all Intl Xeon)

    Actual core count EACH processor

    Obtain total count by multiply by 2 since 2 procs.

    All HT-capable

    Other specs
    $0 (base-line, for price comparison)Silver 41108-core => 162.10GHz 11.00MB Cache (85W)
    +460Silver 411410-core => 202.20GHz 13.75MB Cache (85W)
    +1,200

    Silver 4116

    12-core => 242.10GHz 16.50MB Cache (85W)
    +1,628Gold 511510-core => 202.40GHz 13.75MB Cache (85W)
    +1,960 (availability delay)Gold 511812-core => 242.30GHz 16.50MB Cache (105W)
    +3,280Gold 613016-core => 322.10GHz 22.00MB Cache (125W)
    +5,060Gold 613820-core => 402.00GHz 27.50MB Cache (125W)
    +7,560Gold 615222-core => 442.10GHz 30.25MB Cache (140W)
    +6,560 (availability delay)Platinum 815316-core => 322.00GHz 22.00MB Cache (125W)
    +10,160 (and +$400 server)Platinum 816024-core => 482.10GHz 33.00MB Cache (150W)
    +13,560 (and +$400 server)Platinum 816426-core => 522.00GHz 35.75MB Cache (150W)
    +16,660 (and +$400 server)Platinum 817026-core => 522.10GHz 35.75MB Cache (165W)
    +19,760 (and +$400 server)Platinum 817628-core => 562.10GHz 38.50MB Cache (165W)

    Why server with 2 processors? Why not one or four, for example?

    No savings buying just a one-processor server, especially if want more cores. JUST the price of the process jumps by the cost of an entire server!

    • +$5,080: 16 total cores => 24 total cores (one proc)

    Consider four processors only if needed and can afford many more cores. Option is not cost-effective for the core-counts we are currently looking at. Other considerations:

    • Currently, only older processors are currently as  an option with four-processor servers.
    • Server prices START at about $12,000, for 32 total cores.
    • Core counts and price upgrades are "times 4", not "times 2".

    Status

    10/5/17: Oliver met with Mahdi <mh2356> and Kushal <ks2285>. Action steps to have Peng review and refine:

    ...