Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Identifying what can/can't be fixed by Spring
  2. Improving instructions for instructors
  3. Ares web form for instructors: direct to Blackboard?
  4. Baseline requirements/enhancements for Reserves system:
    Identify the top 3 requirements for Reserves in each area (not only what is currently lacking):

Processing side:*

  • Pulling in bibliographic data to automate the populating of fields (replacement for function of Tom's Ares Tools).
  • Open URL (to enable faculty to request items and be able to get bibliographic data).
  • Support for bibliographic fields other than just monographs or serials (i.e. music, scores, etc.).
  • Ability to gather statistical information (circulation).
  • Print reserve lists for archival purposes without having to use a print screen function.
  • Archive and reuse course reserve lists over a many year period.
    b)    End
  • Others?

End-user interface (CUL Course Help)

  • Clear, intuitive interface for students seeking Reserves (Usability group is working on this piece).
  • This should include issues of call numbers, facet sorting, grouping, and alphabetical sorting.
  • Clear, step-by-step instructions for instructors to submit and track requests, including clear guidelines on copyright issues.
  • Others?

Back end issues

  • Structured course data – person creating course reserves must select from authoritative course roster descriptors.
  • No complications with Blackboard in the creation of course reserve lists.
  • Others?

Support issues

  • Minimal or no down time.
  • Key staff who work with Reserves (in Access Services or IT/Systems) should not be on vacation first week of Spring or Fall semesters.
  • Clear communication between reserves processing staff.
  • Vendor must be responsive to requests for fixes and enhancements.
  • Others? c)    Back end issues
    d)    Support issues