Number: BPWG1 Use of LStools for Columbia Description: Apply LStools for test use to load records (Herta Berengeur) directly into Columbia's CLIO Date proposed: 20140116 - 201403** ; Planning meeting 20140313 Responsibility: Batch Processing Working Group Documentation: Meeting notes of 20140313 meeting Conclusion: TBD Cost/Benefit: Alleviate LITO workload ; Reduce TS dependency on external departments Assessment: Underway **************************************** Number: BPWG2 MARC21 Repertoire.cfg Description: Share updates and modification of Voyager client file MARC21 Repertoire.cfg ; Date proposed: 201312** Responsibility: Batch Processing Working Group Documentation: ###Added the following ranges: #Bengali (character range U+0980 to U+09FF) #Devanagari (character range U+0900 to U+097F) #Tamil (character range U+0B80 to U+0BFF) #Thai (character range U+0E00 to U+0E7F) ###pm66 Cornell - Batch Processing 2013-12-23 #Left to right display character (U+200F) #Armenian (character range U+0530 to U+058F) ###mw18 Columbia - MPS 2013-12-27 Conclusion: Success ; more updates to follow (Ethiopic and Syriac) Cost/Benefit: Redundancy of tasks eliminated ; shared expertise Assessment: One time and ongoing benefit until next system migration ; system improvement **************************************** Number: BPWG3 Shared email address for MARC file deposits Description: Provide vendors with email address to send MARC files for 2CUL Date proposed: 20140116 Responsibility: Batch Processing Working Group Documentation: vendor-marc@libraries.cul.columbia.edu Conclusion: Email alias created ; implementation and Assessment ongoing. Cost/Benefit: Build toward single MARC depository for 2CUL Batch Processing Units Assessment: Ongoing **************************************** Number: BPWG4 Strawn tool VGerselet & LStools Description: Use of STRAWN tools (VGER Select) to harvest ISBN's from Precat/Offprecat Chronological segments for onsite/remote batch searching and processing/enhancement ; possible role for LStools in loading/upgrading batch file. Date proposed: 20140131 Responsibility: Batch Processing Working Group Documentation: forthcoming Conclusion: TBD Cost/Benefit: Lessen dependency on OCLC batch process that has proven limitations ; share resources and expertise to reduce backlogs and enhance discovery Assessment: TBD **************************************** Number: Proposal / Project / Test Name Description: Date proposed: Responsibility: Documentation: Conclusion: Cost/Benefit: Assessment: ****************************************